MHB Finding Side Lengths of Tangram Shapes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deeds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shapes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the side lengths of various tangram shapes, specifically isosceles right triangles, a square, and a parallelogram, arranged to form a 1x1 unit square. The user has successfully calculated the dimensions of the large triangles but is uncertain about the next steps without making midpoint assumptions. There is a request for clarification on the mathematical reasoning behind the placement of certain points, particularly how JF lies on a diagonal of the square. The response explains that since JF is perpendicular to a known diagonal and passes through a vertex, it must be part of that diagonal. The conversation highlights the challenges of visualizing and mathematically proving relationships within the tangram configuration.
Deeds
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm trying to find the lengths of the sides of all of the shapes in the below tangram. This is what is given:
• 2 large, and congruent, isosceles right triangles
• 1 medium isosceles right triangle
• 2 small, and congruent, isosceles right triangles
• 1 square
• 1 parallelogram

The pieces can be rearranged with no gaps or overlapping of shapes into a square with dimensions 1 unit by 1 unit (i.e., the entire area of the square is 1 unit^{2}) You cannot make midpoint assumptions.

I've figured out the lengths of the two large triangles. (1 for the hypotenuse and \sqrt{2}/2 for the other two legs). Without assuming midpoints, I'm not sure where to go next. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • task 2  puzzle.png
    task 2 puzzle.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 159
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi,
I hope the following is understandable and helps.

sfxtnp.png


jrb5ex.png
 
johng said:
Hi,
I hope the following is understandable and helps.

Thank you so much for your help. Most of it I understand. I will sit with this later to see if I can get it to connect in my brain. :-) If not, I'll ask you more questions.

Again, thank you so much!
 
See also http://mathhelpboards.com/geometry-11/tangrams-11357.html?highlight=tangram.
 
johng said:
Hi,
I hope the following is understandable and helps.

I'm confused about how you know that JF lies on a diagonal of the large square. I can understand how AK does and I can visually and conceptually see how JF would, but how can I mathematically show that?

Sorry, this problem is so difficult for me. Thanks again.
 
Deeds said:
I'm confused about how you know that JF lies on a diagonal of the large square. I can understand how AK does and I can visually and conceptually see how JF would, but how can I mathematically show that?
You know that AK is a diagonal of the large square. You also know that JF is perpendicular to AK (because the angles at F are right angles). Since the diagonals of a square are perpendicular to each other, it follows that JF must be parallel to the other diagonal. But since it passes through the vertex J, it must actually be part of that diagonal.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top