MHB Finding Side Lengths of Tangram Shapes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deeds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shapes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the side lengths of various tangram shapes, specifically two large congruent isosceles right triangles, one medium isosceles right triangle, two small congruent isosceles right triangles, one square, and one parallelogram. The entire arrangement fits into a 1 unit by 1 unit square without gaps or overlaps. The lengths of the large triangles have been established as 1 for the hypotenuse and √2/2 for the legs. The challenge lies in mathematically proving the positioning of segments within the square, particularly how segment JF relates to the square's diagonals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of isosceles right triangles
  • Knowledge of geometric properties of squares and their diagonals
  • Familiarity with basic trigonometry
  • Ability to visualize geometric arrangements without midpoint assumptions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of isosceles right triangles in geometry
  • Learn how to prove relationships between segments in geometric figures
  • Study the concept of geometric transformations and their implications on shape arrangements
  • Explore advanced techniques in geometric proofs, particularly involving angles and perpendicular lines
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry students, educators teaching tangram concepts, and anyone interested in geometric proofs and properties.

Deeds
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm trying to find the lengths of the sides of all of the shapes in the below tangram. This is what is given:
• 2 large, and congruent, isosceles right triangles
• 1 medium isosceles right triangle
• 2 small, and congruent, isosceles right triangles
• 1 square
• 1 parallelogram

The pieces can be rearranged with no gaps or overlapping of shapes into a square with dimensions 1 unit by 1 unit (i.e., the entire area of the square is 1 unit^{2}) You cannot make midpoint assumptions.

I've figured out the lengths of the two large triangles. (1 for the hypotenuse and \sqrt{2}/2 for the other two legs). Without assuming midpoints, I'm not sure where to go next. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • task 2  puzzle.png
    task 2 puzzle.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 176
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi,
I hope the following is understandable and helps.

sfxtnp.png


jrb5ex.png
 
johng said:
Hi,
I hope the following is understandable and helps.

Thank you so much for your help. Most of it I understand. I will sit with this later to see if I can get it to connect in my brain. :-) If not, I'll ask you more questions.

Again, thank you so much!
 
See also http://mathhelpboards.com/geometry-11/tangrams-11357.html?highlight=tangram.
 
johng said:
Hi,
I hope the following is understandable and helps.

I'm confused about how you know that JF lies on a diagonal of the large square. I can understand how AK does and I can visually and conceptually see how JF would, but how can I mathematically show that?

Sorry, this problem is so difficult for me. Thanks again.
 
Deeds said:
I'm confused about how you know that JF lies on a diagonal of the large square. I can understand how AK does and I can visually and conceptually see how JF would, but how can I mathematically show that?
You know that AK is a diagonal of the large square. You also know that JF is perpendicular to AK (because the angles at F are right angles). Since the diagonals of a square are perpendicular to each other, it follows that JF must be parallel to the other diagonal. But since it passes through the vertex J, it must actually be part of that diagonal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
55K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K