MHB Finding Taylor Series of $\dfrac{1}{z-i} \div \left(z+i\right)$

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the Taylor series for the function (1/(z-i))/(z+i), where z is a complex number. The initial step involves simplifying the expression to 1/(z^2+1) and then rewriting it as 1/(1-(-z^2)) to apply the geometric series formula. Although there was a preference for keeping the original fraction format for integration purposes, the alternative method proved to be effective and straightforward. The Taylor series remains consistent regardless of the function's representation. Ultimately, both approaches lead to the same series expansion around zero.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
I am trying to find the Taylor series for
$$\displaystyle
\dfrac{\left(\dfrac{1}{z-i}\right)}{z+i}
$$
where z is a complex number.There is a reason it is set up as a fraction over the denominator so let's not move it down.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the first thing I would do is go ahead and do this division- $$\frac{\frac{1}{z- i}}{z+ i}= \frac{1}{z^2+ 1}$$

Then I would rewrite it as $$\frac{1}{1-(-z^2)}$$ and use the formula for the sum of a geometric series:
$$\sum r^n= \frac{1}{1- r}$$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Well, the first thing I would do is go ahead and do this division- $$\frac{\frac{1}{z- i}}{z+ i}= \frac{1}{z^2+ 1}$$

Then I would rewrite it as $$\frac{1}{1-(-z^2)}$$ and use the formula for the sum of a geometric series:
$$\sum r^n= \frac{1}{1- r}$$

Thanks, I was trying to do something a little different with it but that will suit the objective.
 
It was after posting that I noticed your "There is a reason it is set up as a fraction over the denominator so let's not move it down". That seems strange. What was your reason? Of course, the Taylor's series (about 0) will be the same however you write the function.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It was after posting that I noticed your "There is a reason it is set up as a fraction over the denominator so let's not move it down". That seems strange. What was your reason? Of course, the Taylor's series (about 0) will be the same however you write the function.

It had to do with a contour integral and I was going to integrate it as two separate integrals, because I thought it would work out nicer that way. However, doing it in this manner is fine. I was trying to fit a different form but this was obviously easier and still fit the right form in the end.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K