Different series than Taylor series for a function

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the series representation of the function ##\frac{1}{1+x^2}##, particularly in the context of solving an integral involving this function. Participants explore different series expansions, including those that are not Taylor series, and examine their validity under various conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the series representation of ##\frac{1}{1+x^2}##, suggesting it does not relate to Taylor series.
  • Another participant identifies the series as derived from the generalized binomial expansion, specifically for ##|x|>1##.
  • A different participant challenges the correctness of the generalized binomial expression provided earlier.
  • One participant introduces the concept of complex analysis, suggesting a Taylor expansion centered at infinity by substituting ##w = 1/x##.
  • Another participant agrees with the previous point but notes a potential error in the factor of the series representation.
  • One participant attempts to derive the series from the Taylor series for ##\frac{1}{1-r}##, emphasizing its fundamental nature in power series and analytic functions.
  • Another participant acknowledges the earlier point about the series being valid at infinity, reinforcing the connection to the expansion's validity.
  • A participant unfamiliar with complex analysis inquires about the relationship between the discussed series and Laurent series, referencing WolframAlpha's output.
  • One participant reiterates the importance of the expansion of ##\frac{1}{1-z}##, noting its significance despite previously stated similar points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and derivation of the series representation for ##\frac{1}{1+x^2}##. There is no consensus on the correctness of the generalized binomial expansion or the relationship to Taylor and Laurent series.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the series representation is valid for specific conditions, such as ##|x|>1##, and that assumptions about the integration interval may affect the discussion. There are also references to the importance of understanding complex analysis and power series.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I am trying to solve an integral that has ##\frac{1}{1+x^2}## as a factor in the integrand. In my book it is claimed that if we use ##\displaystyle \frac{1}{1+x^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{1}{x^{2n+2}}## the problem can be solved immediately. But, I am confused as to where this series representation comes from... It certainly has nothing to do with Taylor series it seems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expression the OP gave is valid for ##|x|>1##. It is the generalized binomial as mathman said, although I think the equation he posted isn't quite correct.
 
have you ever done any complex analysis? in that setting we often find it convenient to complete the complex plane by adding in a point at infinity, and then one can make a taylor expansion centered at infinity.

in your case set w = 1/x and then 1/(1+x^2) becomes w^2/(1+w^2) which has a taylor expansion centered at w= 0, or x = infinity:

namely 1/(1+x^2) = w^2/(1+w^2) = (geometric series) w^2 (1 -w^2 + w^4 ±...) = (1/x^2)(1 - 1/x^2 + 1/x^4 ± ...) = 1/x^2 -1/x^4 + 1/x^6 ±...

(in particular mathman's equation seems off by a factor of 1/x^2.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97, FactChecker, haushofer and 1 other person
jasonRF said:
The expression the OP gave is valid for ##|x|>1##. It is the generalized binomial as mathman said, although I think the equation he posted isn't quite correct.
Ah, yes, I implicitly assumed the integration interval is between 0 and 1, but the exercise is probably an integral which has an integration interval outside of this. My bad.
 
One can obtain this series from the Taylor series ## \frac 1 {1-r} = 1+r+r^2+r^3+\cdots ##, which is valid for ##|r|<1##.
$$\frac 1 {1+x^2} = x^{-2} \frac 1 {x^{-2}+1} = x^{-2} \frac 1 {1 - (-x^{-2})}$$
$$= x^{-2} (1+(-x^{-2})+(-x^{-2})^2+(-x^{-2})^3+(-x^{-2})^4+\cdots)$$ which is valid for ##|x^{-2}|<1##.

If you study power series and analytic functions, the series ## \frac 1 {1-r} = 1+r+r^2+r^3+\cdots ##, ##|r|<1## will be fundamental.
 
that is of course exactly what i said above in #5, but maybe looks more elementary by not mentioning the point at infinity where x^(-2) = 0. note too that the series is also valid at x = infinity since both sides equal zero. indeed this is the reason the expansion works.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
mathwonk said:
have you ever done any complex analysis? in that setting we often find it convenient to complete the complex plane by adding in a point at infinity, and then one can make a taylor expansion centered at infinity.

in your case set w = 1/x and then 1/(1+x^2) becomes w^2/(1+w^2) which has a taylor expansion centered at w= 0, or x = infinity:

namely 1/(1+x^2) = w^2/(1+w^2) = (geometric series) w^2 (1 -w^2 + w^4 ±...) = (1/x^2)(1 - 1/x^2 + 1/x^4 ± ...) = 1/x^2 -1/x^4 + 1/x^6 ±...

(in particular mathman's equation seems off by a factor of 1/x^2.)
I have not studied complex analysis yet. But, does this have anything to do with what's called a Laurent series? I'm asking because on WolframAlpha, when I input ##\frac{1}{1+x^2}## it gives the Maclaurin series expansion at 0 and also gives ##\displaystyle \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (-1)^n \frac{1}{x^{2n+2}}## and calls it the Laurent series expansion at ##\infty##.
 
  • #10
mathwonk said:
that is of course exactly what i said above in #5, but maybe looks more elementary by not mentioning the point at infinity where x^(-2) = 0. note too that the series is also valid at x = infinity since both sides equal zero. indeed this is the reason the expansion works.
Yes. I hadn't noticed that you had already given the same answer till later. When I realized that, I decided not to delete my post because I think that the expansion of ##\frac 1 {1-z}## is so important and I wanted to state that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K