MHB Finding the 3rd Number to Keep Variance Unchanged

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variance
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have a problem solving this question...

to the numbers 0 and 2, we want to add a 3rd number, such that the variance won't change. What is the 3rd number ?

(when I say variance I mean dividing by n, not by n-1)

thanks !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Hello

I have a problem solving this question...

to the numbers 0 and 2, we want to add a 3rd number, such that the variance won't change. What is the 3rd number ?

(when I say variance I mean dividing by n, not by n-1)

thanks !
The variance is the square root of the sum of the differences from of the data points from the mean so... $\sigma^2=\frac{1}{2}\left[(0-1)^2+(2-1)^2\right]=1$. If we add the new point $y$, we will need to solve the system of equations. $\mu=\frac{1}{3}\left[ 0+2+y\right]$ and $\sigma^2=\frac{1}{3}\left[(0-\mu)^2+(2-\mu)^2+(y-\mu)^2\right]=1$ This will give a quadratic equation in $y$
 
TheEmptySet said:
The variance is the square root of the sum of the differences from of the data points from the mean so... $\sigma^2=\frac{1}{2}\left[(0-1)^2+(2-1)^2\right]=1$. If we add the new point $y$, we will need to solve the system of equations. $\mu=\frac{1}{3}\left[ 0+2+y\right]$ and $\sigma^2=\frac{1}{3}\left[(0-\mu)^2+(2-\mu)^2+(y-\mu)^2\right]=1$ This will give a quadratic equation in $y$

If we divide the variance by n instead of by (n-1), we can only do so if the expected mean $\mu$ is given.
Otherwise we would lose a degree of freedom.

So the set of equations should be:

$\sigma^2=\frac{1}{2}\left[(0-\mu)^2+(2-\mu)^2\right]$
$\sigma^2=\frac{1}{3}\left[(0-\mu)^2+(2-\mu)^2+(y-\mu)^2\right]$

This does introduce the problem that we have more unknowns than equations.
 
I like Serena said:
If we divide the variance by n instead of by (n-1), we can only do so if the expected mean $\mu$ is given.
Otherwise we would lose a degree of freedom.

So the set of equations should be:

$\sigma^2=\frac{1}{2}\left[(0-\mu)^2+(2-\mu)^2\right]$
$\sigma^2=\frac{1}{3}\left[(0-\mu)^2+(2-\mu)^2+(y-\mu)^2\right]$

This does introduce the problem that we have more unknowns than equations.
Maybe I am misunderstanding something but the way I read the problem was if we have the data set $\{0,2 \}$ we can calculate the mean and variance directly. Now if a new data set is created by adding one other point $\{0,2,y \}$. We can now calculate the new population mean and the new variance of this three point data set. Now we can just solve for what $y$ needs to be. I will wait for clarification from the OP on this.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top