MHB Finding the Area of Shaded Part

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the area of a shaded region involving triangles and a sector of a circle. The area of triangle OAPB is derived from the areas of similar triangles OAP and OBP, resulting in a total of 110.4 cm². The area of the sector is calculated as 94.2 cm², leading to a shaded area of 16.2 cm² after subtraction. An alternative method for finding the shaded area is also presented, yielding approximately 15.33 cm². The calculations have been verified through multiple approaches, confirming their accuracy.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
find the area of the shaded part

first I tried to find out the area of $OAPB$ which can be found by adding triangles $OAP$ and $OBP$ which are similar, $AP$ and $BP$ are perpendicular to the radius and tangent to the circle$BP = 12\tan{37.5^0}=9.2 cm^2$

area $\Delta OBP= \frac{1}{2}(12)(9.2)=52.2 cm^2$

area $OAPD = 2(52.2)= 110.4 cm^2$

area of sector $\frac{75}{360}\pi 12^2 = 94.2 cm^2$

so shaded area $= 110.4 - 92.2 = 16.2 cm^2$

just seeing if this is OK i went over it quite a few times...
no ans given ...(Cool)(Coffee)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Area of $\displaystyle OAPB$ is:

$\displaystyle 15\cdot12\sin(37.5^{\circ})$

Subtract the area of sector $\displaystyle OAB$:

$\displaystyle A_S=15\cdot12\sin(37.5^{\circ})-\frac{1}{2}12^2\cdot\frac{5\pi}{12}=180\sin(37.5^{\circ})-30\pi\approx15.329277613875924$

I have verified this using another method as well.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top