Finding the current through the battery

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the current through a battery in a circuit involving multiple resistors. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the equivalent resistance and the role of a specific 1 ohm resistor in the circuit setup.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding the equivalent resistance and applying Ohm's law. There are attempts to set up Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) equations, with some questioning the labeling of currents and the implications of current splitting at junctions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's attempts to clarify their understanding of the circuit. Some guidance has been offered regarding labeling currents and setting up equations, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the labeling of currents and the setup of KCL equations. Participants are also considering the symmetry of the circuit and the implications of current paths on their calculations.

Vanessa Avila
Messages
94
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I am confused what to do but I have to find the current through the battery:
gFFgItf.jpg


Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


I decided to find the equivalent resistance and do V/R = I using the 14V, but I believe my Req is wrong. What is throwing me off is the horizontal 1 ohm resistor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show the details of your attempt. How did you try to reduce the network to a single equivalent resistance?

What's your backup plan? :smile:
 
Vanessa Avila said:

Homework Statement


I am confused what to do but I have to find the current through the battery:
gFFgItf.jpg


Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


I decided to find the equivalent resistance and do V/R = I using the 14V, but I believe my Req is wrong. What is throwing me off is the horizontal 1 ohm resistor.
There may be a trick to simplify it because of the symmetry of the resistance values, but it's probably just easiest to write the KCL equations and solve them. Can you show us that work?

EDIT -- Oops, beaten out by gneill again! :smile:
 
Would this be right?

14V - I1(1Ω) - I1(2Ω) = 0
So that would give me I1 = 4.67 A
 
Vanessa Avila said:
Would this be right?

14V - I1(1Ω) - I1(2Ω) = 0
So that would give me I1 = 4.67 A
You'll have to show us what ##i_1## is on your diagram, but I would say that it's very unlikely. Any current through R3 would "break" any attempt to consider the vertical paths as isolated series connected resistors.
 
gneill said:
You'll have to show us what ##i_1## is on your diagram, but I would say that it's very unlikely. Any current through R3 would "break" any attempt to consider the vertical paths as isolated series connected resistors.
My bad. Here's what I was trying to do:
e8LKYVG.jpg
I realized that the I1 splits as soon as it reaches the junction and i can either keep going to the right or down. So that means my equation for my loop has to involve I2 right?
 
Vanessa Avila said:
My bad. Here's what I was trying to do:
e8LKYVG.jpg
I realized that the I1 splits as soon as it reaches the junction and i can either keep going to the right or down. So that means my equation for my loop has to involve I2 right?
You can either write the multiple KVL equations, or the multiple KCL equations. I personally prefer KCL, but either will work. Are you familiar with how to write them?
 
berkeman said:
You can either write the multiple KVL equations, or the multiple KCL equations. I personally prefer KCL, but either will work. Are you familiar with how to write them?
Yes. How my professor taught it to us is that we have to set directions for the current and create a clockwise or a counter-clockwise loop. My biggest problem with it is keeping it to only 3 unknown currents (I1, I2, and I3) as he advised. I get confused when I am past assigning where I3 is.
 
I think how i labeled the diagram was wrong. Would the current going through R3 be (I2 + I3) ?
EA5xuJ0.jpg
 
  • #10
One way to minimize the number of currents you "invent" while labeling the circuit is to only ever add the minimum required number of currents at any junction you come across while proceeding systematically through the circuit. If you can, label new paths using mathematical combinations of existing currents.

For example, if you go into a junction with i1 and two unlabeled paths diverge from there, make one current i2 and the other i1-i2. Thus only one "new" current is introduced at that junction rather than two.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanessa Avila
  • #11
gneill said:
One way to minimize the number of currents you "invent" while labeling the circuit is to only ever add the minimum required number of currents at any junction you come across while proceeding systematically through the circuit. If you can, label new paths using mathematical combinations of existing currents.

For example, if you go into a junction with i1 and two unlabeled paths diverge from there, make one current i2 and the other i1-i2. Thus only one "new" current is introduced at that junction rather than two.

Okay. I relabeled everything. Can you check to see if i did it right?
u4GDwaL.jpg
 
  • #12
Check the KCL sum at the center right node. Everything else looks okay.
 
  • #13
gneill said:
Check the KCL sum at the center right node. Everything else looks okay.
would it be -I3-I2?
 
  • #14
Vanessa Avila said:
would it be -I3-I2?
No. remember, whatever is flowing out of the node must also be flowing into the node. You have I2 and I3 both flowing out, so what must flow in on the remaining path?
 
  • #15
I2 + I3 ?

Sorry, I'm a little confused about this stuff :sorry:
 
  • #16
Vanessa Avila said:
I2 + I3 ?
Yup.
Sorry, I'm a little confused about this stuff :sorry:
No worries. After a bit of practice it'll suddenly "cick" and you'll wonder what all the fuss was about :smile:
 
  • #17
gneill said:
Yup.

No worries. After a bit of practice it'll suddenly "cick" and you'll wonder what all the fuss was about :smile:
Oh okay! Thanks :smile:

So if I were to assign three loops like this
a8MvWOt.jpg

would these be the right eqns?

Eqn #1: (loop with 14V, starting after the 14V)
14V - (I2+I1)*(1Ω) - (I1+I2+I3)*(2Ω) = 0

Eqn #2: (upper loop, starting above I2+I1)
(I2+I1)*(1Ω)+(I2)*(2Ω) - (I3)*(1Ω) = 0

Eqn #3: (lower loop, starting above I1+I2+I3)
(I1+I2+I3)*(2Ω) + I3*(1Ω) + (I3+I2)*(1Ω) = 0
 
  • #18
I'd say that they look good. I don't spot any problems.
 
  • #19
gneill said:
I'd say that they look good. I don't spot any problems.
:) Awesome! So finding the current through the battery, i have to find I1, I2 and I3 and sum them together to use in the V=IR equation, where V = 14V?
 
  • #20
Vanessa Avila said:
:) Awesome! So finding the current through the battery, i have to find I1, I2 and I3 and sum them together to use in the V=IR equation, where V = 14V?
Your I1 flows through the battery. Find I1 and you're done (of course you need to mostly solve everything to get there... unless you use something like Cramer's Rule to find just the one current).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanessa Avila
  • #21
Okay thanks a lot! :) I really appreciate it!
gneill said:
Your I1 flows through the battery. Find I1 and you're done (of course you need to mostly solve everything to get there... unless you use something like Cramer's Rule to find just the one current).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
981
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K