Finding the deBroglie wavelength: conceptual issue

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the de Broglie wavelength of an electron with a given kinetic energy of 3.50 eV. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the application of energy equations, particularly in relation to total energy and the use of relativistic versus non-relativistic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the wavelength using both kinetic energy and total energy approaches, leading to different results. Some participants question the validity of using certain equations for electrons versus photons.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the differences between the energy equations applicable to massive particles and massless particles, with some guidance offered on the correct application of momentum and energy relationships. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's confusion stemming from the presentation of these concepts in class.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that their professor advised against using relativistic equations due to the energy level being considered, which adds to the complexity of the discussion.

bachfromthedead
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hello all! I am new to this forum, though I have been lurking for a long time. I intend to fill out my profile and introduce myself, but finals leave me with little time to spare at the moment. I have this final next week and would like to sort this out beforehand, hence the hasty post!
Thank you in advance.

1. Homework Statement

An electron has kinetic energy 3.50eV. Find it's wavelength.

Homework Equations


(1) p=mv
(2) K=½mv2
(3) p=E/c=h/λ

(4) Er=mc2
(5) Etotal=K+Er

The Attempt at a Solution


Note: my prof said not to use relativistic equations, as the energy is not high enough, but we have covered relativity in this class.
I now know how to solve this problem:
I solved for the speed of the electron with the kinetic energy formula, and put it into the following:
λ=h/(mv)
I got 0.656nm, which is correct.

My problem is that I did not initially solve the problem this way. What I did first was calculate the rest energy of the electron (Er=mc2) and add it to the kinetic energy to get the "total" energy. This was based off an equation which I was given by my prof: Etotal=K+Er. I then took that "total" energy and solved for the wavelength by deriving the equation: λ=hc/E from equation (3) above. I got the wrong answer, 0.00242nm, with this method.
What I don't understand is why my original method does not work. I'm assuming my fundamental understanding of these equations is wrong. Is the total energy of the electron not the rest energy plus the kinetic energy? Is there something I'm missing? My professor was not helpful this time around, so I'm turning to you guys!
Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

bachfromthedead said:
This was based off an equation which I was given by my prof: Etotal=K+Er. I then took that "total" energy and solved for the wavelength by deriving the equation: λ=hc/E from equation (3) above. I got the wrong answer, 0.00242nm, with this method.

In getting the equation λ=hc/E, it looks like you assumed that the momentum is related to energy by p = E/c. This is not correct for electrons. (But it is correct for photons.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bachfromthedead
[QUOTE="bachfromthedead, post: 5450436, member: 591656".[/QUOTE]
E = pc is true only if E is kinetic energy only. Rest energy must be zero, as in a photon.
For a particle of rest mass m, E = γmc2 - mc2 = kineic energy = total energy - rest energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bachfromthedead
Thank you very much to both of you! It makes sense now, I think that the way these equations were presented in my class was the root of my confusion. I should have realized that E=pc would only apply to photons as it includes c.
 
bachfromthedead said:
I should have realized that E=pc would only apply to photons as it includes c.
For particles that have mass ##m##, ##E = \sqrt{(pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2}##. This still contains ##c##.

For massless particles like the photon, this reduces to ##E = pc##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K