De Broglie wavelength of an electron

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mass, velocity, and de Broglie wavelength of an electron and an alpha particle given a kinetic energy of 2 MeV. The subject area includes relativistic physics and energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate formulas for relativistic kinetic energy and question the application of these formulas to both the electron and the alpha particle. There are attempts to clarify the distinction between invariant mass and effective mass, as well as the implications of relativistic versus non-relativistic scenarios.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing feedback on each other's calculations and reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of total energy in calculations, and there is an exploration of whether the alpha particle can be treated as relativistic or not.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the rest energy of the alpha particle and its relationship to the given kinetic energy, indicating that the problem may involve assumptions about relativistic effects based on the energy scales involved.

Cay
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm reposting this thread with some editing suggested by fresh_42:

1. Homework Statement

Calculate the mass, velocity and the de Broglie wavelength of an electron and an alpha particle, given the kinetic energy K = 2MeV

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



please find attached![/B]


I went through my calculations again and I think I have one problem in determining the formula of relativistic kinetic energy. What I used is: E = m*c^2, where m - the effective mass of the electron. I'm afraid I should've used
E = m*c^2 - m0*c^2, where m = m0/sqrt(1-β^2). Is that correct?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3671.jpg
    IMG_3671.jpg
    73.6 KB · Views: 636
Physics news on Phys.org
You're correct about the error. I prefer to use ##m## to refer to the invariant (rest) mass, but to avoid confusion I'll stick with your notation and terminology. So ##K = mc^2 - m_0c^2## or ##(m - m_0)c^2##.

Or you could just say the total energy is 2 MeV plus the rest energy of the electron, 0.511 MeV. So then ##mc^2 = 2.51## MeV. Go through all the same steps but using that value of total energy rather than the 2 MeV.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cay
RPinPA said:
You're correct about the error. I prefer to use ##m## to refer to the invariant (rest) mass, but to avoid confusion I'll stick with your notation and terminology. So ##K = mc^2 - m_0c^2## or ##(m - m_0)c^2##.

Or you could just say the total energy is 2 MeV plus the rest energy of the electron, 0.511 MeV. So then ##mc^2 = 2.51## MeV. Go through all the same steps but using that value of total energy rather than the 2 MeV.
Thank you for replying!
However, if I apply the relativistic energy formula also for the alpha particle, I get that effective mass is approximately the same as the rest mass. So I would get that β=0, which is not possible. What am I doing wrong?
 
Cay said:
Thank you for replying!
However, if I apply the relativistic energy formula also for the alpha particle, I get that effective mass is approximately the same as the rest mass. So I would get that β=0, which is not possible. What am I doing wrong?

An alpha particle is two protons and two neutrons, each of which has a rest energy of approximately 1 GeV. So 2 MeV is a very small fraction of the rest energy and this particle is not relativistic. Use the low-velocity formula ##K = (1/2)mv^2##.

To be precise, the rest energy of an alpha is 3.727 GeV, so 2 MeV kinetic energy increases that to 3.729 GeV total energy. If you want to use the relativistic formula, the increase is a factor of 3.729/3.727 = 1.00054 = ##1/\sqrt{1-\beta^2}##. ##\beta## is indeed close to zero, meaning as I said this is not a relativistic particle and it is moving at a small fraction of ##c##.

In contrast, the electron has a total energy of 2.5 MeV which is nearly 5 times its rest energy, so that is definitely a relativistic particle.

It's often a good idea to first do a sanity check to see "is this a relativistic particle or not?"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K