MHB Finding the equation of parabola

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamescv31
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
jamescv31
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Greetings, I‘m trying to analyze the given of directrix x = -1, axis y = 2, and latus rectum as 2

I believe there‘s two possibility equations.

I‘m not sure for finding the vertex since I got between ( -.5, 0) and origin itself.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I presume that, by "latus rectum as 2", you mean that the length of the latus rectum is 2. In a parabola that is always 4 times the distance from the vertex to the focus so that distance is 1/2. that is also the distance from the vertex to the directrix so the vertex must be at (-1+ 1/2, 1)= (-1/2, 1) (with the parabola opening in the positive x direction) or at (-1- 1/2, 1)= (-3/2, 1) (with the parabola opening in the negative x direction).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes the length of latus rectum is 2
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top