1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Finding the focal length of a negative lens without another lens.

  1. Sep 30, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A simple method for determining the focal length of a negative lens is shown below. Prove this is true.
    Negativelensfocallenght.png

    2. Relevant equations
    linmag.gif

    3. The attempt at a solution
    The linear magnification formula relates magnification, the distance from the lens to the image (i), the distance from the lens to the object (o) and the height of the two images (h'/h). The lens equation relates distance to the object and distance to the image and the focal length. I know I have to use these two equations but I have not been able to prove this is true. This is kind of frustating considering it's a simple problem, but can anyone point me in the right direction?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 30, 2014 #2
    I don't think you have to use the formulas above. What you have on the screen is not the image of any object.
    What kind of image will be produced by a divergent lens? Can you catch on a screen? Where will be the image of the sun produced by the lens?

    But the problem it is much simpler. Is pure geometry. If you extend the divergent rays (the ones on the left hand side of the lens) to the right hand side of the lens, they will meet in a point. What is the location of this point? How far from the lens?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Finding the focal length of a negative lens without another lens.
Loading...