Finding the hamiltonian of a projectile

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the Hamiltonian for a projectile of mass m moving under uniform gravity, using Cartesian coordinates. The original poster expresses uncertainty about determining the position coordinates and their relationship to time and angle.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of cyclic coordinates and their relevance to the Hamiltonian. There is a focus on treating coordinates and momenta as independent variables and the need to derive the Hamiltonian from the Lagrangian. Questions arise about the appropriateness of using trigonometric functions for position coordinates.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the conceptual framework needed to approach the problem. There is an emphasis on understanding the definitions of kinetic and potential energy in the context of Hamiltonian mechanics, and some participants suggest reconsidering the approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem should be approached from a more advanced perspective, specifically the action principle, and that the trajectory should not be determined directly. There is also mention of the need to identify any ignorable coordinates in the context of the Hamiltonian formulation.

pentazoid
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using cartesian coordinates, find the Hamiltonian for a projectile of mass m moving under uniform gravity. Obtain Hamiltonian's equation and identify any cyclic coordinates.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I think I will just have trouble determining my coordinates for the position; my coordinates are x and y. I think I can finished the rest of the problem once I know my coordinates for the position

would x=x = v t*cos (theta) , t=x/(v*cos(theta)) and
y=v*t*sin(theta)-.5*g*t^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cyclic coordinates does not mean polar coordinates... why are you working with sines and cosines of theta?

In determining your Hamiltonian you should treat coordinates (and momenta) as independent variables. You then solve Hamilton's equations for the coordinates and momenta as functions of time.

Cyclic coordinates are coordinates which do not appear in the Hamiltonian. For example the Hamiltonian of a free particle moving in the absence of any forces is:
[tex]H = \frac{1}{2m}\left(p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2\right)[/tex]
that is to say the Hamiltonian is just the kinetic energy. Since there are no (coordinate dependent) forces none of the coordinates, (x,y,z) appear in the Hamiltonian and so all of them are Cyclic.
 
jambaugh said:
Cyclic coordinates does not mean polar coordinates... why are you working with sines and cosines of theta?

In determining your Hamiltonian you should treat coordinates (and momenta) as independent variables. You then solve Hamilton's equations for the coordinates and momenta as functions of time.

Cyclic coordinates are coordinates which do not appear in the Hamiltonian. For example the Hamiltonian of a free particle moving in the absence of any forces is:
[tex]H = \frac{1}{2m}\left(p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2\right)[/tex]
that is to say the Hamiltonian is just the kinetic energy. Since there are no (coordinate dependent) forces none of the coordinates, (x,y,z) appear in the Hamiltonian and so all of them are Cyclic.

H=T+V, why did you leave out V? I am using cosine and sines of theta because I need to determined x and y?
 
pentazoid said:
I am using cosine and sines of theta because I need to determined x and y?
No. x and y are undetermined, and you want to keep them that way. You seem to be approaching this problem as a first year student, but you need to approach this problem in the more advanced context of the action principle. You are not supposed to determine a trajectory.

The first thing to do is to right down the Lagrangian and determine if there are any ignorable coordinates. Since the problem asks for the Hamiltonian in Cartesian coordinates, then the problem is a straightforward application of the definitions of potential energy, kinetic energy, canonical momentum, and symmetry.
 
pentazoid said:
H=T+V, why did you leave out V? I am using cosine and sines of theta because I need to determined x and y?

I am not going to give you your Hamiltonian. I gave you the example of a Hamiltonian for a different system, namely a particle without any force due to gravity or otherwise and so V=0. I did this to show you what is meant by cyclic coordinates.

Reread my post carefully!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K