Undergrad Finding the inverse tangent of a complex number

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the arctangent of a complex number, specifically the formula for \( w = \arctan(z) \) where \( z = x + iy \). The proposed solution is \( \tan^{-1}(z) = \frac{1}{2} \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{2x}{1-x^2-y^2}\right) + i \frac{1}{2} \tanh^{-1}\left(\frac{2y}{1+x^2+y^2}\right) \). The discussion emphasizes avoiding logarithmic expressions and instead utilizing trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Key identities and transformations are applied to derive the final formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex number theory
  • Trigonometric identities
  • Hyperbolic functions
  • Algebraic manipulation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the arctangent function for complex numbers
  • Explore the properties of hyperbolic functions in complex analysis
  • Learn about angle sum identities in trigonometry
  • Investigate the relationship between trigonometric and hyperbolic functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with complex analysis, particularly those interested in trigonometric and hyperbolic function applications in complex number calculations.

bsaucer
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Inverse Tangent of complex number in rectangular form.
Let z=x+iy, and w=u+iv. I am looking for a formula to find the arctangent of z, or w=arctan(z). I want the results of u and v to be in terms of trigonometric and hyperbolic functions (and their inverses) and not in terms of logarithms. The values u and v should be functions of x and y.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The formula
$$\tan^{-1}z=\frac{i}{2}\log\frac{i+z}{i-z}$$
seems useful to me but you do not like logarithm.
 
Last edited:
If you can get as far as <br /> e^{2iz} = \frac{w + 1}{w - 1} then \begin{split}<br /> \cos 2z &amp;= \frac{w^2 + 1}{w^2 - 1} \\<br /> \sin 2z &amp;= \frac{2w}{w^2 - 1}\end{split} so the problem is reduced to solving <br /> \begin{split}\cos (2x + 2iy) &amp;= A \\ \sin (2x + 2iy) &amp;= B\end{split} for x and y. The left hand sides can be expanded using the angle sum formulae and the identities <br /> \cos 2iy = \cosh 2y, \qquad \sin 2iy = i\sinh 2y. By taking ratios of real and imaginary parts we end up with <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \tan 2x \tanh 2y &amp;= - \frac{ \operatorname{Im} A}{\operatorname{Re} A} \\<br /> \tan 2x \coth 2y &amp;= \frac{ \operatorname{Re} B}{\operatorname{Im} B}\end{split} whence <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \tan^2 2x = -\frac{ \operatorname{Im} A \operatorname{Re} B}{ \operatorname{Re} A \operatorname{Im} B} \\<br /> \tanh^2 2y = -\frac{ \operatorname{Im} A \operatorname{Im} B}{ \operatorname{Re} A \operatorname{Re} B}.\end{split}
 
It's been a while, but I'm back. After some algebraic and trig manipulation, here is what I came up with:

tan-1(z) = tan-1(x+iy) = ½ tan-1(2x/(1-x2-y2)) + i ½ tanh-1(2y/(1+x2+y2))

Please verify if I'm correct...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
844
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K