MHB Finding the LCD of two expressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter zolton5971
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expressions Lcd
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the least common denominator (LCD) of the fractions 3/(2x-2) and x/(5x-5). Participants clarify that both denominators can be factored to reveal a common factor of (x - 1). The least common multiple (LCM) of the coefficients 2 and 5 is identified as 10, but the LCD must also include the variable factor. The correct LCD is thus expressed as 10(x - 1), emphasizing the importance of including variable factors in the calculation. Understanding the factorization and LCM process is crucial for accurately determining the LCD.
zolton5971
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Another question for you? Find the least common denominator of 3/(2x-2) and x/(5x-5)

I came up with 10?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zolton5971 said:
Another question for you? Find the least common denominator of 3/(2x-2) and x/(5x-5)

I came up with 10?

How could you possibly get 10 when your denominators both have an x in them?

Notice $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2x - 2 = 2(x - 1) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 5x - 5 = 5( x - 1) \end{align*}$. So both already have a factor of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} (x - 1) \end{align*}$, so now you're just left finding the LCM of 2 and 5...
 
zolton5971 said:
Another question for you? Find the least common denominator of 3/(2x-2) and x/(5x-5)

I came up with 10?

We ask that new questions not be tagged onto existing threads, as this can cause a thread to become convoluted and hard to follow, plus a new thread is likely to draw more attention. :D

So, I moved the relevant posts to a new thread.
 
MarkFL said:
We ask that new questions not be tagged onto existing threads, as this can cause a thread to become convoluted and hard to follow, plus a new thread is likely to draw more attention. :D

So, I moved the relevant posts to a new thread.

You're answer should include an $$x$$ somewhere

The lowest common multiple (LCM) is given by splitting each term into prime factors and multiplying by the highest power of each prime factor. For example to find the LCM of 10 and 15 (it's 30) you'd do

$$10 = 2 \times 5 \text{ and }\ 15 = 3 \times 5[/math] so the LCM is given by $$2 \times 3 \times 5 = 30$$

You can do the same with algebraic fractions but remember to treat any polynomials or variables as prime - after simplifying you have $$\dfrac{3}{2}(x-1)^{-1}$$ and $$5(x-1)^{-1}$$

Can you use the method above to find the LCD?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top