MHB Finding the LCD of two expressions

  • Thread starter Thread starter zolton5971
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expressions Lcd
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the least common denominator (LCD) of the fractions 3/(2x-2) and x/(5x-5). Participants clarify that both denominators can be factored to reveal a common factor of (x - 1). The least common multiple (LCM) of the coefficients 2 and 5 is identified as 10, but the LCD must also include the variable factor. The correct LCD is thus expressed as 10(x - 1), emphasizing the importance of including variable factors in the calculation. Understanding the factorization and LCM process is crucial for accurately determining the LCD.
zolton5971
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Another question for you? Find the least common denominator of 3/(2x-2) and x/(5x-5)

I came up with 10?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zolton5971 said:
Another question for you? Find the least common denominator of 3/(2x-2) and x/(5x-5)

I came up with 10?

How could you possibly get 10 when your denominators both have an x in them?

Notice $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2x - 2 = 2(x - 1) \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 5x - 5 = 5( x - 1) \end{align*}$. So both already have a factor of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} (x - 1) \end{align*}$, so now you're just left finding the LCM of 2 and 5...
 
zolton5971 said:
Another question for you? Find the least common denominator of 3/(2x-2) and x/(5x-5)

I came up with 10?

We ask that new questions not be tagged onto existing threads, as this can cause a thread to become convoluted and hard to follow, plus a new thread is likely to draw more attention. :D

So, I moved the relevant posts to a new thread.
 
MarkFL said:
We ask that new questions not be tagged onto existing threads, as this can cause a thread to become convoluted and hard to follow, plus a new thread is likely to draw more attention. :D

So, I moved the relevant posts to a new thread.

You're answer should include an $$x$$ somewhere

The lowest common multiple (LCM) is given by splitting each term into prime factors and multiplying by the highest power of each prime factor. For example to find the LCM of 10 and 15 (it's 30) you'd do

$$10 = 2 \times 5 \text{ and }\ 15 = 3 \times 5[/math] so the LCM is given by $$2 \times 3 \times 5 = 30$$

You can do the same with algebraic fractions but remember to treat any polynomials or variables as prime - after simplifying you have $$\dfrac{3}{2}(x-1)^{-1}$$ and $$5(x-1)^{-1}$$

Can you use the method above to find the LCD?
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K