MHB Finding the Leg Lengths of a Right Triangle with an Acute Angle of 22°

AI Thread Summary
To find the leg lengths of a right triangle with a 22° acute angle, the tangent function is applied, where tan(22°) equals approximately 0.40. The options provided are evaluated by dividing the lengths of the legs to see which pair yields a tangent value closest to 0.40. The calculation shows that the leg lengths of 2 and 5 (choice a) result in a tangent value of 0.40, confirming it as the correct answer. The discussion concludes with affirmation of the solution's accuracy.
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
A right triangle has an acute angle measure of 22°. Which two numbers could represent the lengths of the legs of this triangle?

OPTIONS

a. 2 and 5

b. 1 and 5

c. 3 and 5

d. 4 and 5

I know that each leg represents the sides of the right triangle opposite the hypotenuse. I think the tangent function works best here.

tan(x) = opp/adj

tan(22°) = 0.4040262258

After rounding 0.4040262258 to two decimal places, I get 0.40.

I will divide the left side number by the right side number per choice given.

2/5 = 0.40

1/5 = 0.20

3/5 = 0.80

4/5 = 0.80

I say the answer is choice a.

Choice a = tan(22°).

Is this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Looks good. 😁
 
MarkFL said:
Looks good. 😁

Thank you, Mark. Check your PM here.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top