Finding the limit of a complicated funcion

  • Thread starter Thread starter xcrunner448
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the limit of a complicated function involving a sum of powers divided by a power of n, specifically the expression \(\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1^{1}+2^{2}+\ldots+(n-1)^{n-1}+n^{n}}{n^{n}}\). Participants are exploring various approaches to evaluate this limit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants initially attempt to simplify the limit by considering the contributions of individual terms, questioning the validity of focusing on the "last term." Others suggest using recursive formulas and bounding techniques to analyze the limit more rigorously.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively sharing their attempts and reasoning, with some expressing uncertainty about the complexity of their methods. There is an ongoing exploration of different bounding strategies, and while some guidance has been offered, no consensus has been reached on a definitive approach.

Contextual Notes

There is a recognition of the challenge posed by the infinite number of terms in the limit, and participants are considering the implications of choosing different numbers of terms for their bounding strategies. Some constraints of the problem, such as the need for a simpler solution, are also noted.

xcrunner448
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find [itex]\stackrel{lim}{_{n\rightarrow\infty}}\frac{1^{1}+2^{2}+...+(n-1)^{n-1}+n^{n}}{n^{n}}[/itex].


2. The attempt at a solution

At first I split up the fraction into a sum of a bunch of terms, and said that all of the terms went to 0 except the last, which is 1. But then I realized that in the limit, there is an infinite number of terms so it makes no sense to say that the "last term" is 1. I think I found a way to prove it by finding a recursive formula for the function inside the limit and then using that to get upper and lower bounds, which both converge to 1. But that was really long and seemed like a very round-about way of doing things. Is there a simpler way to get the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xcrunner448 said:

Homework Statement



Find [itex]\stackrel{lim}{_{n\rightarrow\infty}}\frac{1^{1}+2^{2}+...+(n-1)^{n-1}+n^{n}}{n^{n}}[/itex].


2. The attempt at a solution

At first I split up the fraction into a sum of a bunch of terms, and said that all of the terms went to 0 except the last, which is 1. But then I realized that in the limit, there is an infinite number of terms so it makes no sense to say that the "last term" is 1. I think I found a way to prove it by finding a recursive formula for the function inside the limit and then using that to get upper and lower bounds, which both converge to 1. But that was really long and seemed like a very round-about way of doing things. Is there a simpler way to get the answer?


Sure. You do a really ruthless upper bound of the first (n-2) terms of your series. But I find it hard to believe you found a recursive formula for the function that gives you anything useful. Can you show me that?
 
Ok, here's my current solution. Like I said, it seems like an overly complicated way of doing it, and I wouldn't be surprised if there is some mistake in there somewhere.
 

Attachments

xcrunner448 said:
Ok, here's my current solution. Like I said, it seems like an overly complicated way of doing it, and I wouldn't be surprised if there is some mistake in there somewhere.

Maybe that works. It does seem a little complicated. I'd start by saying [itex]1^{1}+2 ^{2}+...+(n-2)^{n-2} \le (n-2) (n-2)^{n-2}[/itex]. Do you see how it would go from there?
 
Ok, that makes sense. It makes it a sum of 3 terms, the first two of which go to 0 and the last goes to 1. I think I tried that too, but with the first n-1 terms and that didn't work. I guess it never occurred to me to try it with the first n-2 terms. Thanks for your help.
 
xcrunner448 said:
Ok, that makes sense. It makes it a sum of 3 terms, the first two of which go to 0 and the last goes to 1. I think I tried that too, but with the first n-1 terms and that didn't work. I guess it never occurred to me to try it with the first n-2 terms. Thanks for your help.

Yeah. Doing it with the first (n-1) terms gives an upper limit that's too big. So you need to chose a smaller upper limit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K