Finding the Limit of x as t Tends to Infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter nokia8650
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the limit of the expression x = (e^(2kt) - 1)/(4e^(2kt) - 2) as t approaches infinity, focusing on the behavior of the exponential terms involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest factoring out e^(2kt) from the numerator and denominator and discuss the implications of dividing by the largest term. There is mention of using L'Hopital's rule, though some consider it unnecessary. Questions arise regarding the sign of k and how it affects the limit, with specific cases being discussed.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different approaches to the limit, with some providing guidance on factoring and dividing terms. There is acknowledgment of the need to consider different cases based on the value of k, and the discussion is ongoing without a definitive consensus on the implications of k being negative.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of k being positive, but participants also recognize the need to address cases where k is zero or negative, indicating that assumptions about k are a significant part of the discussion.

nokia8650
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
"x = (e^(2kt) - 1)/(4e^(2kt) - 2)"

How would I find the limit of this expression as t tends to infinity?

As t --> infinity, the two exponentials also tend to infinity. However, that was as far as I could go. It is clear by subbing large values of t in, that the limit should be 1/4, however I am unable to prove this.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Factor e^(2kt) out of the top and bottom.
 
One of the first things you should have learned is to divide both numerator and denominator by the "largest" term- in this case e^(2kt) (that's what Vid was saying). You will be left with e^(-2kt) in each and that's easy.

You could also use L'Hopital's rule here but that is "overkill"
 
k is positive, I hope. Otherwise you'd better split into cases.
 
If k is negative, the only thing that changes is whether you add or subtract zero; there's no need for cases.
 
Vid said:
If k is negative, the only thing that changes is whether you add or subtract zero; there's no need for cases.

Add or subtract zero? There are three different cases. k>0, k=0 and k<0.
 
My statement about k being positive or negative is true,but I did forget about k=0, which does need its own case.
 
Thanks so much for the help. I forget to mention that k is positive. Therefore, I get:

x = (1-1/e(^2kt)) / ((4 - 2/e(^2kt))

Thus, as t tends to infinity, x will tend to 1/4.

However, say k were to be negative, how would it change? Would x tend to 1?

Thanks
 
If k is negative then exp(2kt)->0. Then you can just drop the exponentials and get 1/2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K