Finding the Moment of Inertia for a Rectangular Sheet

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a rectangular sheet with uniform mass distribution, specifically around the z-axis at the midpoint of the horizontal side. The moment of inertia is derived using the formula I = Icm + mr^2, where Icm is the moment of inertia about the center of mass and r is the distance to the center of mass. It is clarified that for the z-axis at the center of mass, the moment of inertia is zero, as both Icm and r are zero. The importance of considering the geometry of the object is emphasized, as mass elements further from the axis significantly influence the total moment of inertia. Ultimately, integration over the entire object is necessary to accurately determine the moment of inertia before applying the parallel axis theorem for adjustments.
reslion
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The horizontal side (x-axis) is length 2A and the vertical side (y-axis at x=+-A) is length B. The mass is uniform throughout the sheet so that the center of mass is at the center of the rectangle. What is the moment of inertia for. the rotation around the z-axis at the midpoint of the horizontal side, coordinate (0,0) in terms of A,B and/or mass? The z-axis at the center of mass (hint: use parallel axis)?

Homework Equations


I=Icm+mr^2 where Icm is the center of mass moment and r is the distance to center of mass.

The Attempt at a Solution


For part a, the moment of inertia for a point mass is just I=mr^2, so since the center of mass is (B/2) away from the axis, then I=m*(B/2)^2. However, shouldn't we use parallel axis for part a and not part b, in contrary to the hint for part b?
For part b, the moment of inertia would just be zero? This is because lcm=0 as the axis is at the center of mass and r=0 as the point is also at the center of mass, so I=Icm+mr^2=0+m(0)=0.

Is this the correct way to get both or did I miss something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For moments of inertia the geometry of the object is important. Mass elements that are further from the axis of rotation have a greater impact on the total, and elements closer have less of an impact. Because the contributions vary as the square of the distance you can't just lump the mass at the center of gravity and use the point mass formula on it. You'll have to do the integration over the object.

Once you've established the MOI about one axis though, you can use the parallel axis theorem to "move it" to any parallel axis.
 
  • Like
Likes reslion
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K