Finding the New Gradient: A Statistical Tables Book Guide

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
steven10137
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have have a set of data pairs (x, y);
(1, a)
(2, b)
(3, c)
(4, d)
(5, e)
(6, f)
(7, g)

The least squares regression line for the this set is y=3x-12

Determine the new gradient of this line if the original set of scores has been transformed to;

(6, a+3)
(12, b+3)
(18, c+3)
(24, d+3)
(30, e+3)
(36, f+3)
(42, g+3)

i.e. the x scores have been multiplied by 6, and the +3 has been added to the y scores.
Now from my statistical tables book; I have the formula;
[tex]m_{gradient} = \frac{{{\rm{covariance}}}}{{{\rm{variance}}}} = \frac{{S_{xy} }}{{S_{x^2 } }}[/tex]

how can I find the new gradient?

The answer says;
[tex]\begin{array}{l}<br /> m_{gradient} = \frac{{{\rm{covariance}}}}{{{\rm{variance}}}} = \frac{{S_{xy} }}{{S_{x^2 } }} = \frac{{ \times 6}}{{ \times 36}} = \times \frac{1}{6} \\ <br /> Hence\;gradient\;is\;now\;3 \times \frac{1}{6} = \frac{1}{2} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

I don't really understand how this process works and don't want to assume anything that is wrong

thanks in advance
Steven
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm no expert on statistics but I know that the "gradient" of a line is just its slope. I would have done this, ignoring all the statistical stuff, by arguing that y is now yold+ 3 and x is now 6xold so that yold= y- 3 and xold= x/6. Since you are told that yold= 3xold- 12, you now have y-3= 3(x/6)- 12 or simply y= x/2- 15. The slope (gradient) of that line is 1/2.
 
Cheers for that HallsofIvy!

seems like the obvious thing to do looking back lol

thanks!
 
hi steven10137,
can you please tell me the name of the book from where you read this formula
of gradient and correlation.