I Finding the orthogonal projection of a vector without an orthogonal basis

AimaneSN
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hi there,

I am currently reading a course on euclidian spaces and I came across this result that I am struggling to prove :

Let ##F## be a subspace of ##E## (of finite dimension) such that ##F=span(e_1, e_2, ..., e_p)## (not necessarily an orthogonal family of vectors), let ##x \in E##

Then we have:

##\forall y \in F## : ##y=p_F(x) \Leftrightarrow \forall i= 1,...,p : (x-y,e_i) = 0##

where ##(.,.)## denotes an inner product
and the linear map ##p_F## is the orthogonal projection onto ##F##.

I managed to prove the equivalence only when the family of the vectors ##(e_i)## is orthogonal but the result is more general.

Thank you and I would appreciate any hint or help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The inner product ##(x-y,e_i)## is zero for all ##i## if and only if ##x-y\in F^\perp## if and only if ##x## is of the form ##x=y+z## where ##z\in F^{\perp}## if and only if ##y## is the orthogonal projection of ##x## onto ##F##.

Your post was a bit of effort to read- it would be better to use latex.
 
Thank you for your reply, it's much clearer now. I just modified my post using Latex code.
 
OP: Notice you can always use Gram-Schmidt to orthogonalize your basis vectors, and this won't affect the span .
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...

Similar threads