MHB Finding the Perimeter of an Odd Shape.

  • Thread starter Thread starter RidiculousName
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perimeter Shape
RidiculousName
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I have been looking around for information on how to find the perimeter of an odd shape, but I can't find any explanations that seem to fit because the given shape is partially rounded. I already know the answer is $$16 + 2\pi$$ but I am unsure how they came to it. I'm guessing they get $$16$$ from $$7 + 3 + 3 + 3$$, and $$2\pi$$ by halving the value of the length of the dotted line and multiplying by $$\pi$$, but I don't trust myself to guess.

View attachment 8236
 

Attachments

  • t1.jpg
    t1.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 129
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've edited your post to wrap the expressions containing \pi in $$$$ tags. All $\LaTeX$ markup must be wrapped in tags.

The circular arc is half the circumference of a circle whose diameter is 4 units in length. $\pi$ is defined to be the ratio of the circumference $C$ to the diameter $D$ of a circle:

$$\pi=\frac{C}{D}\implies C=\pi D\implies \frac{C}{2}=\frac{\pi D}{2}$$

And so the perimeter $P$ is:

$$P=3\cdot3+7+\frac{\pi\cdot4}{2}=16+2\pi$$
 
The bottom has length 7. The straight line portion of the top has length 3. That leaves 7- 3= 4 as the diameter of the semi-circle. The circumference of a full circle is "\pi D, pi times the diameter- here 4\pi. The <b>semi</b>-circle has circumference half that, 2\pi. The perimeter of the entire figure is 7+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 2\pi= 16+ 2\pi.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top