Finding the Range of the given function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kaushik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    function range
Click For Summary
The function f(x) = 6^x + 3^x + 6^{-x} + 3^{-x} + 2 has a minimum value of 6, as determined by analyzing its components. The approach using the Arithmetic Mean-Geometric Mean (AM-GM) inequality initially suggests a lower bound of 5 * 2^{1/5}, but this does not accurately reflect the function's behavior. By separating the function into g(x) = 6^x + 3^x + 6^{-x} + 3^{-x} and adding the constant 2, it becomes clear that g(x) has a minimum of 4, leading to f(x) being at least 6. The minimum values of the individual exponential terms confirm this result, as both 6^x + 6^{-x} and 3^x + 3^{-x} achieve their minimums at x = 0. Thus, the correct range for f(x) is confirmed to be f(x) ≥ 6.
Kaushik
Messages
282
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
Find the range of ##f(x) = 6^x + 3^x + 6^{-x} + 3^{-x} + 2##
Relevant Equations
AM >= GM
##f(x) = 6^x + 3^x + 6^{-x} + 3^{-x} + 2##

But, ## AM >= GM##

So,

##f(x) >= 5 * 2 ^ {\frac{1}{5}}##

But this is not the case. According to the graph, it is ## f(x) >= 6##.

?hash=1b7894284589b0f79085f4f37f7a56da.png


If I do the same thing without considering the constant '2' then I am getting the answer.

let ##g(x) = 6^x + 3^x + 6^{-x} + 3^{-x} ## and ##f(x) = g(x) + 2##

Using ##AM>=GM##,

##g(x) >= 4##

Hence, ##f(x) >= 6##

Why is this the case? Why is the latter approach working but no the former?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-03-18 at 1.02.59 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-03-18 at 1.02.59 AM.png
    16.5 KB · Views: 267
Physics news on Phys.org
Kaushik said:
Homework Statement:: Find the range of ##f(x) = 6^x + 3^x + 6^{-x} + 3^{-x} + 2##
Relevant Equations:: AM >= GM

##f(x) = 6^x + 3^x + 6^{-x} + 3^{-x} + 2##
Kaushik said:
But, ## AM >= GM##
So,
##f(x) >= 5 * 2 ^ {\frac{1}{5}}##
I don't see what AM >= GM has to do with this problem, or how the inequality you show is related to this problem. Certainly ##f(x) \ge 5 \cdot 2^{1/5}##, but that's a very rough lower bound.
Kaushik said:
But this is not the case. According to the graph, it is ## f(x) >= 6##.

View attachment 258864

If I do the same thing without considering the constant '2' then I am getting the answer.

let ##g(x) = 6^x + 3^x + 6^{-x} + 3^{-x} ## and ##f(x) = g(x) + 2##

Using ##AM>=GM##,

##g(x) >= 4##

Hence, ##f(x) >= 6##

Why is this the case? Why is the latter approach working but no the former?
##6^x + 6^{-x}## has a minimum value of 2 for x = 0. Likewise, ##3^x + 3^{-x}## also has a minimum value of 2 at x = 0. Add these pairs together + 2, and you get a minimum value of 6.
 
  • Like
Likes nomadreid, Kaushik and SammyS

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K