Finding the reactions at the supports, 3D model

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the reactions at the supports of a 3D model structure, focusing on the equilibrium of forces and moments. Participants engage in a homework problem that involves calculating forces in various members of the structure using equilibrium equations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents their calculations for the reactions at supports A, B, and C, using equilibrium equations for forces and moments.
  • Another participant questions the assumption of equal distribution of the 3 kN force between supports B and C, suggesting that additional equations are needed due to the nature of the pin joint at E.
  • A participant reflects on the implications of the pin joint at E, proposing that the force at reactions B in the x and y directions is zero, leading to a conclusion about the force at C in the x direction.
  • There is a suggestion to explore orthogonal views to simplify the problem, although one participant expresses uncertainty about this method.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of verifying reaction components using independent equilibrium equations before proceeding with member force calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding the distribution of forces at supports B and C, and whether the approach taken is sufficiently rigorous. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct assumptions and methods to apply.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the reactions at the supports, particularly concerning the nature of the pin joint and the distribution of forces. The discussion highlights the need for additional equations to fully resolve the problem.

lazypast
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi. See attached, I need to determine the forces in all members.


Homework Equations


Sum of forces in X, Y & Z all equal 0.
Sum of moments in X, Y & Z all equal 0.


The Attempt at a Solution



I've drawn the reactions at each support, A, B and C in my 2nd attached

ƩFx=0 ∴ 8+3-R(ax)-R(bx)-R(cx)=0
ƩFy=0 ∴ R(ay)+R(by)+R(cy)=0
ƩFz=0 ∴ 20+20+20-R(az)-R(bz)-R(cz)=0

After taking moments from various places and about various axis, I get Reactions at:

A-x= 8
y= 0
z=20

B-x= ?
y= 0
z= 9

C-x= ?
y= 0
z= 31

All in kN. The workings are just long winded so I'll put the important bit in - the unknowns R(bx) and R(cx).

Taking moments at A about the Z axis
0.866R(bx)+0.866R(cx)+0.866(3)+0.5R(cy)-0.5R(by)=0

R(cy)=R(by)=0 & dividing by 0.866
The equation becomes:

R(bx) + R(cx) = -3kN

I would say 3kN is shared equally between point C and B, but I have no proof, i.e. I can't see an equation that shows R(bx)=R(cx). Can I just assume 3kN is shared equally and R(bx) = R(cx) = 1.5kN
 

Attachments

  • 3D members.jpg
    3D members.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 916
  • IMG00053-20121221-0848.jpg
    IMG00053-20121221-0848.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 822
Physics news on Phys.org
If E is a pin joint, not able to resist moment about any axis, what does this imply for the reaction components at B? You have only 6 equilibrium equations for the whole frame, but you have assumed 9 reaction components. You need three more equations. If E is a pin joint, that gives you two more equations, considering the equilibrium of EB alone. Perhaps you are too algebraic in your approach? Yes, you do in the end have to solve equations, but have you considered drawing the three orthogonal views parallel to each of the x, y, z directions, to see if some simplification or symmetry makes itself apparent? And you cannot assume that B and C equally resist the 3 kN force.
 
Last edited:
Yes I am quite algebraic in my approach, but it's all logic so I have more confidence it's correct. I apprectiate your response.

Ive had a think about why you chose a pin joint at E. The EB leg seems only suited to taking a tensile force (z component). Realistically speaking there would be a huge force at the joint if it wasn't a pin joint. I now believe the force is zero at reactions B in the x and y planes. So I can say the force at C in the x direction is 3kN.Now I have all 9 values I can start calculating the force in each member.

You mention orthogonal views. I will research this a little, the book I'm using hasn't mentioned that method. Does it help finding the reactions or finding the forces in the members?
 
You may well be correct with your reaction components. Before calculating member forces, you can check the reaction components by using 6 independent equilibrium equations. Algebraic sum of forces in 3 directions should be zero. Algebraic sum of moments about any 3 non-parallel axes should be zero. That will give you the confidence to proceed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K