Finding the Smallest Subgroup of A_4 Containing Two Given Even Permutations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sutupidmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the smallest subgroup of the alternating group A_4 that contains two specific even permutations, (12)(34) and (123). Participants explore the implications of subgroup generation, Lagrange's theorem, and the differences between abelian and non-abelian groups in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the smallest subgroup containing both permutations is A_4 itself, based on the idea that it must include all elements generated by the permutations and their products.
  • Another participant suggests denoting the subgroup as G = <(12)(34), (123)> and mentions Lagrange's theorem, indicating that the order of G must divide the order of A_4.
  • There is a discussion about the order of the subgroup generated by multiple elements and the relevance of the least common multiple (lcm) of their orders.
  • One participant introduces the concept of the external direct sum in the context of abelian groups, noting that this method does not apply to non-abelian groups.
  • Clarification is sought regarding the notation used for the subgroup generated by the two permutations, with some participants questioning the standard notation and its implications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the subgroup generated by the two permutations, with some asserting it is A_4 while others discuss the implications of subgroup generation without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the application of Lagrange's theorem and the specific properties of the subgroup generated by non-abelian groups. The notation used for subgroup generation may lead to confusion among participants.

sutupidmath
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
4
I was curious to know, say we have two even permutations taken out of A_4, say
(12)(34) and (123), and we want to find the smallest subgroup of A_4 that contains both these permutations, then how would we go about it.
This subgroup in this case will defenitely be A_4 itself, here is how i came to this conclusion.
SInce that subgroup should contain both these permutations, then it also should contain the subgroups generated by those permutations, and also the elements that are derived when we multiply these by each other, i kept going this way, and i finally generated the whole A_4. BUt imagine if we were working with a group of higher order, since ordA_4 =12, then this would be a pain.

SO my real question is this, is there any clever way of finding these subgroups that contain, like in this case, two other elements.

If it were just for one, i know that the smallest subgroup would be the cyclic subgroup generated by that element, but what about this case?

Any input is greately appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let G = <(12)(34), (123)> denote the subgroup you are looking for. Obviously, <(12)(34)> and <(123)> are subgroups of G. By Lagrange's theorem (I think), the order of both of them divides the order of G. In this case, you will easily find that |G| = |A_4| (check it!).
In general, the order of <a, b, c, ...> must therefore be divisible by lcm(a, b, c, ...) (try an induction proof :smile:).
 
In the case of abelian group there is clever way.
If [tex]S_a[/tex] is subgoup generated by a and [tex]S_b[/tex] is subgroup genrerated by b
the subgroup generated by a and b is [tex]S_a \oplus S_b[/tex].

but in the case of nonablelian group. can not use this method.
 
CompuChip said:
Let G = <(12)(34), (123)> denote the subgroup you are looking for. Obviously, <(12)(34)> and <(123)> are subgroups of G. By Lagrange's theorem (I think), the order of both of them divides the order of G. In this case, you will easily find that |G| = |A_4| (check it!).
In general, the order of <a, b, c, ...> must therefore be divisible by lcm(a, b, c, ...) (try an induction proof :smile:).

Hmm... with G = <(12)(34), (123)> are you implying that G is the subgroup that is generated by (12)(34) and (123) or simply a subgroup that contains these two elements?

Because we are using this notation [a] to denote a cyclic group, or a group/subgroup generated by a.
 
Jang Jin Hong said:
In the case of abelian group there is clever way.
If [tex]S_a[/tex] is subgoup generated by a and [tex]S_b[/tex] is subgroup genrerated by b
the subgroup generated by a and b is [tex]S_a \oplus S_b[/tex].

but in the case of nonablelian group. can not use this method.

what does this mean [tex]S_a \oplus S_b[/tex]. In other words, what is the meaning of this symbol [tex]\oplus[/tex] ?
 
[tex]\oplus[/tex] means external direct sum.
if you want to know more, read a textbook.
 
sutupidmath said:
Hmm... with G = <(12)(34), (123)> are you implying that G is the subgroup that is generated by (12)(34) and (123) or simply a subgroup that contains these two elements?

Because we are using this notation [a] to denote a cyclic group, or a group/subgroup generated by a.

Ah, I am using the notation
<a, b, ...>
for the group generated by a, b, ...
That is, the smallest group which contains a, b, ...

I think that's standard notation, actually, that's why I didn't explain it. My fault.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K