Finding the Solution to the Equation 2^x = 12 + 4x

  • Thread starter Thread starter WeiLoong
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving the equation 2^x = 12 + 4x, which falls under the subject area of algebra and exponential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various approaches including logarithmic manipulation, trial and error with specific values, and graphical methods to find intersections. There is also mention of the Lambert W function as a potential tool.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with multiple participants exploring different interpretations and methods. Some guidance has been offered, such as trying specific values and plotting functions, but no consensus on a definitive approach has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion regarding the relevance of the Quadratic Equation, indicating a need for clarification on the equation's structure. Participants are also considering the behavior of the functions involved for different ranges of x.

WeiLoong
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



2^x=12+4x Find x.

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried to change it in form of logarithm xlog2=log4+log3+x and i found that log(3+x) is unexpandable so i was stuck here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Weiloong, welcome to PF :smile: !

Your change isn't correctly written: it is true that log(2x) = x log 2, but for log (12 + 4x) you meant log 4 + log(3+x) and that indeed doesn't help all that much.

Why don't you do some trial and error and see what comes out: x = 1, 2, 3, etc...
 
You could also try plotting the left and right sides of the equation and seeing where the curves meet, though that only gives an approximate answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189
WeiLoong said:

Homework Equations



none

Isn't the Quadratic Equation relevant here? :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Isn't the Quadratic Equation relevant here? :smile:
I don't think so, since the LHS has 2x rather than x2.
 
SteamKing said:
I don't think so, since the LHS has 2x rather than x2.

Oops, thanks! I misread it. o0)
 
That looks like a candidate for the Lambert W function.
 
You can rewrite the equation as x=2(x-2)-3. Both sides are increasing functions. Plotting them, you can see where the roots are. For positive x, it should be greater than 4. If x is negative, it should be near -3. Trial and error will work :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K