Finding the Stretch of a Hanging Mass on a Spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonbase
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the stretch of a spring when a mass is hung from it, specifically a spring with a spring constant of k = 50 N/m and a mass of m = 1.5 kg. The weight of the mass exerts a force of 14.7 N on the spring, leading to an initial calculation of stretch using the formula F = kx, resulting in an x value of 0.29 m. However, the user discovers that the error in their calculation was due to not considering significant figures, which ultimately affected the accuracy of their result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Basic knowledge of potential energy equations in physics
  • Familiarity with significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Ability to perform force balance calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Hooke's Law and its applications in spring mechanics
  • Study the concept of potential energy in elastic systems
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in physics calculations
  • Explore advanced problems involving springs and mass systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of spring dynamics and force balance problems.

moonbase
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spring with spring constant k = 50 N/m and unstretched length of L is attached to the ceiling. A block of mass m = 1.5 kg is hung gently on the end of the spring. How far does the spring stretch?

Homework Equations


PEspring=0.5kx2
Fspring=-kx

The Attempt at a Solution


When the mass hangs at rest at its lowest point where the spring is stretched the furthest, its weight is exerting a force of 14.7 N on the spring. Likewise, the spring should be exerting that same force on the mass, but plugging that into the force equation by dividing 14.7 by 50 gives an x value of 0.29 m, but this is incorrect. I must be overlooking something since I know I probably have to use the potential energy equation too. Any know what I'm doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are there any particular units that they want the result expressed in? The force balance approach should be correct.
 
Oh, apparently I was right, it was the significant figures that were saying it was wrong. Thanks anyway!
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K