Finding the value of a fraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Value
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a complex fraction involving terms raised to the fourth power, specifically in the context of a math competition problem. Participants are exploring methods to simplify the expression without direct computation, as calculators are not permitted.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various strategies for simplifying the expression, including factoring and recognizing patterns in the terms. Some question the necessity of factoring the fourth power terms and whether there are alternative methods to avoid brute force calculations.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different approaches, including hints about recognizing sequences and potential cancellations in the expression. Some participants have offered insights into factoring techniques and the structure of the polynomial, while others are still seeking clarity on the problem context and requirements.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is derived from a math competition, but details about the specific subject matter or chapters related to the problem are unclear. The original poster has indicated that the problem statement is concise, consisting of a single line.

songoku
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
395
Homework Statement
Find:
[itex]
\frac{(61^4 + 324)(73^4 + 324)(85^4 + 324)(97^4 + 324)}{(55^4 + 324)(67^4 +324)(79^4 + 324)(91^4 + 324)}
[/itex]
Relevant Equations
Not sure
I tried to do like this:

[itex] \frac{((76 - 15)^4 + 324)((76 - 3)^4 + 324)((76 + 9)^4 + 324)((76 + 21)^4 + 324)}{((76 - 21)^4 + 324)((76 - 9)^4 + 324)((76 + 3)^4 + 324)((76 + 15)^4 + 324)}[/itex]

Then stucked

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you just use a calculator? Or even just multiply it out by hand and then use long division? Why are you factoring the terms with the ()^4 ? Maybe there is more to the problem statement?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and YoungPhysicist
berkeman said:
Can you just use a calculator? Or even just multiply it out by hand and then use long division? Why are you factoring the terms with the ()^4 ? Maybe there is more to the problem statement?
Calculator is not allowed. I can try to do it by brute force, I am asking here whether there are some methods to do it without brute force.

No particular reason why I factor the terms with power of 4, I just think maybe I need to find some ways to simplify them because those power will result in big numbers.

Nothing more to the problem statement, I have posted everything. It is just one line question.

So the only way is brute force?

Thanks
 
How about if you figure out what is x if x**4 = 324 and see if that helps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Is there some context for this problem? What subject was being discussed where this problem appears?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
songoku said:
Calculator is not allowed. I can try to do it by brute force, I am asking here whether there are some methods to do it without brute force.

No particular reason why I factor the terms with power of 4, I just think maybe I need to find some ways to simplify them because those power will result in big numbers.

Nothing more to the problem statement, I have posted everything. It is just one line question.

So the only way is brute force?

Thanks
No. You need not use brute force.

There is quite a bit of cancelling which occurs.

You seem to have noticed the sequence in the terms which are raised to the power 4. You have recognized that ##55 = 76-21\,, ~ 61 = 76-15\,, ~\dots , ~ 97=76+21 ## .
Those could be written using the expression ##76+6(n- \frac 1 2 ) ##. With this, n = −3 gives 55, n = −2 gives 61, ... ,
n = 4 gives 97 .

You may find it helpful to clean that up somewhat. An expression such as ##6n + 1 ## gives 55, 61, ... , 97 when n takes on the values 9, 10, ... , 16 respectively.

See if you can factor the degree 4 polynomial, ##(6n+1)^4+324##, as the product of two quadratics. (It may be helpful to substitute by using ##x## in place of ##6n##.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
phinds said:
How about if you figure out what is x if x**4 = 324 and see if that helps.
x4 = 22 . 34, so x = ± 3√2

FactChecker said:
Is there some context for this problem? What subject was being discussed where this problem appears?
The teacher said this is question from math competition (do not know what kind of competition) so I don't know which math chapters this question related to

SammyS said:
No. You need not use brute force.

There is quite a bit of cancelling which occurs.

You seem to have noticed the sequence in the terms which are raised to the power 4. You have recognized that ##55 = 76-21\,, ~ 61 = 76-15\,, ~\dots , ~ 97=76+21 ## .
Those could be written using the expression ##76+6(n- \frac 1 2 ) ##. With this, n = −3 gives 55, n = −2 gives 61, ... ,
n = 4 gives 97 .

You may find it helpful to clean that up somewhat. An expression such as ##6n + 1 ## gives 55, 61, ... , 97 when n takes on the values 9, 10, ... , 16 respectively.

See if you can factor the degree 4 polynomial, ##(6n+1)^4+324##, as the product of two quadratics. (It may be helpful to substitute by using ##x## in place of ##6n##.)
I get the hint

Thank you very much for the help berkeman, phinds, factchecker, sammys
 
@songoku ,

As it turns out, an expression of the form ##\left(u(n)\right)^4+4\cdot M^4## can be written as the following product.

##\left(\left(u(n)-M \right)^2+M^2\right)\left(\left( u(n)+M \right)^2+M^2\right)##

Added in Edit:
Upon further reflection −

Dropping the function notation one can write:
##K^4+4\cdot M^4 = \left(\left(K-M \right)^2+M^2\right)\left(\left( K+M \right)^2+M^2\right)##

Use this directly in the original expression, recalling that ##324 = 4\cdot 3^4 ##

##\dfrac{(61^4 + 324)(73^4 + 324)(85^4 + 324)(97^4 + 324)}{(55^4 + 324)(67^4 +324)(79^4 + 324)(91^4 + 324)} ##

##= \dfrac{((61-3)^2 + 9)((61+3)^2 + 9)\dots((97-3)^2 + 9)((97+3)^2 + 9)}{((55-3)^2 + 9)((55+3)^2 + 9)\dots((91-3)^2 + 9)((91+3)^2 + 9)} ##

##= \dfrac{((58)^2 + 9)((64)^2 + 9)\dots((94)^2 + 9)((100)^2 + 9)}{((52)^2 + 9)((58)^2 + 9)\dots((88)^2 + 9)((94)^2 + 9)} ##

Noticing the significant amount of "cancellation" which occurs, we are left with a rational expression which is reasonably easy to compute − especially considering the size of the numbers involved in doing a direct computation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
SammyS said:
@songoku ,

As it turns out, an expression of the form ##\left(u(n)\right)^4+4\cdot M^4## can be written as the following product.

##\left(\left(u(n)-M \right)^2+M^2\right)\left(\left( u(n)+M \right)^2+M^2\right)##

Added in Edit:
Upon further reflection −

Dropping the function notation one can write:
##K^4+4\cdot M^4 = \left(\left(K-M \right)^2+M^2\right)\left(\left( K+M \right)^2+M^2\right)##

Use this directly in the original expression, recalling that ##324 = 4\cdot 3^4 ##

##\dfrac{(61^4 + 324)(73^4 + 324)(85^4 + 324)(97^4 + 324)}{(55^4 + 324)(67^4 +324)(79^4 + 324)(91^4 + 324)} ##

##= \dfrac{((61-3)^2 + 9)((61+3)^2 + 9)\dots((97-3)^2 + 9)((97+3)^2 + 9)}{((55-3)^2 + 9)((55+3)^2 + 9)\dots((91-3)^2 + 9)((91+3)^2 + 9)} ##

##= \dfrac{((58)^2 + 9)((64)^2 + 9)\dots((94)^2 + 9)((100)^2 + 9)}{((52)^2 + 9)((58)^2 + 9)\dots((88)^2 + 9)((94)^2 + 9)} ##

Noticing the significant amount of "cancellation" which occurs, we are left with a rational expression which is reasonably easy to compute − especially considering the size of the numbers involved in doing a direct computation.

Wow this is just brilliant. What I did was a lot more complex compare to this one. Thank you very much SammyS
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K