Finding the Velocity for Zero Hinge Force in Rigid Body Collision Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a uniform rod hinged at a point, which is struck by a particle, leading to a discussion about the forces acting on the rod immediately after the impact. The focus is on finding the velocity of the particle such that the hinge force on the rod is zero after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of angular momentum about different points, including the pivot and the combined center of mass, to analyze the system's behavior post-impact.
  • Questions arise regarding the direction of forces and the nature of the forces acting on the rod, particularly the normal force and impulsive forces during and after the collision.
  • There is exploration of the implications of zero hinge force and how it relates to the forces acting on the rod after the collision.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions, and clarifying concepts related to angular momentum and forces. Some have identified a misunderstanding regarding the nature of the forces involved, leading to a reevaluation of their approach. There is an ongoing exploration of the conditions under which the hinge force can be zero.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between impulsive forces during the collision and the ordinary forces acting immediately after the collision. There is also mention of the gravitational force's role in maintaining the rod's position post-impact.

zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform rod of mass M and length l is hinged at point O as shown in fig. A small particle of mass M/3 strikes the rod with velocity v at a distance 3l/4 from O and sticks to it. Find the value of v such that the force exerted by the hinge on the rod just after the impact is 0.

attachment.php?attachmentid=31982&stc=1&d=1297023302.jpg



The Attempt at a Solution



There are two forces exerted by the hinge, namely normal force and force due to impulse.
What will be the direction of the force due to impulse? Which force should be 0 according to the question?
 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 555
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Abdul! :smile:

(btw, please try to post images that fit the usual frame width :wink:)

Use conservation of angular momentum about the pivot to find the initial angular velocity.

Then use conservation of angular momentum about the combined centre of mass to find the initial torque at the pivot (and equate it to zero) …

what do you get? :smile:

Abdul Quadeer said:
What will be the direction of the force due to impulse?


what is the direction of acceleration of the centre of mass? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Abdul! :smile:

(btw, please try to post images that fit the usual frame width :wink:)

Use conservation of angular momentum about the pivot to find the initial angular velocity.


I did that before posting :smile:

tiny-tim said:
Then use conservation of angular momentum about the combined centre of mass to find the initial torque at the pivot (and equate it to zero) …

Torque = F*9l/16, where F is the force exerted at the hinge/pivot.
Equating it to 0 gives F=0. What next?
 
hmm … I didn't put that very well last time :redface: … I should have said:

Use conservation of angular momentum (about the combined centre of mass) …

if the impulsive torque is zero, then you know that the angular momentum will be conserved! :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Use conservation of angular momentum (about the combined centre of mass) …

if the impulsive torque is zero, then you know that the angular momentum will be conserved! :smile:

:confused:

Use conservation of angular momentum ( about the combined centre of mass )...angular momentum will be conserved.

Both imply the same thing. I don't get you.
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
Both imply the same thing.

Yes, the second is only there to explain to you why the first works. :wink:
 
Ok...
By conserving the angular momentum about the combined centre of mass,

M/3*v*(3l/4 - 9l/16) = Icombined C.O.M.*wcombined C.O.M.

where ω=12v/25l (which you suggested to find in your first post)

But the 'v' cancels out!
 
Hi Abdul! :smile:

Yes, you're right … the v cancels out. :frown:

Ahh, I've completely misunderstood the question :redface:

it isn't saying that the impulsive force during the collision is zero, it's saying that the ordinary force immediately after the collision is zero …

so (complete change of plan :rolleyes:) you need to find the total centripetal force on the system (as a multiple of ω2), and compare it with the gravitational force …

then the force at the pivot will be zero if … ? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
it's saying that the ordinary force immediately after the collision is zero …

Ordinary force = ?
The normal force by the pivot? If it is 0 then the rod will fly away!
 
  • #10
No, gravity will hold it there temporarily. :smile:
 
  • #11
What about the tension in the rod?
 
  • #12
What tension? :confused:

Get on with it!
 
  • #13
Tension due to the impulsive force at the pivot - which gives the rod a jerk.
 
  • #14
No, forget about that, we read the question wrong …

as I said before, there is an impulsive force at the pivot, but there is no force immediately after the collision.
 
  • #15
Alright, I understood.
The impulsive force acts only for 'dt' seconds...it provides it with an angular velocity w...then the weight of the rod alone provides the required centripetal force for rotation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K