Finding time given average velocity

AI Thread Summary
To find the time t for the car traveling East at 40 km/hr, the average velocity of the entire trip must be 30 km/hr. The car first travels 120 km East at 45 km/hr, taking approximately 2.67 hours, and then goes 50 km West at 70 km/hr, taking about 0.71 hours. After these segments, the total distance and time can be calculated, leading to the conclusion that the car must travel an additional distance to maintain the average velocity. By analyzing the situation graphically or through algebra, the time t is determined to be approximately 3.14 hours. This problem highlights the importance of understanding average velocity in relation to distance and time.
canucks81
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car travels 120km East at 45km/hr, then goes West 50km at 70km/hr, then goes East again for time t at 40km/hr. If the average velocity for the entire trip is 30km/hr East, find the time t.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


time of car traveling East at beginning:
t=d/t 120km/45 kph t = 2.67hr

time of car traveling West
t=d/t 50km/70 kph t = 0.71hr

Now this is where I get stuck. I'm not sure what the next step would be since I'm not given distance for the car traveling East again. The answer is 3.14 hrs. I know a question like this will be on my test tomorrow, so help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
canucks81 said:

Homework Statement


A car travels 120km East at 45km/hr, then goes West 50km at 70km/hr, then goes East again for time t at 40km/hr. If the average velocity for the entire trip is 30km/hr East, find the time t.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


time of car traveling East at beginning:
t=d/t 120km/45 kph t = 2.67hr

time of car traveling West
t=d/t 50km/70 kph t = 0.71hr

Now this is where I get stuck. I'm not sure what the next step would be since I'm not given distance for the car traveling East again. The answer is 3.14 hrs. I know a question like this will be on my test tomorrow, so help would be greatly appreciated.

I would sketch a graph for guidance.

You know how long the vehicle has been traveling for so far, and how far away it currently is. From that can deduce the "other way" of getting there at the right time, just travel 70 km East at a steady speed of (what ever).

Now the graph:

Draw a single line representing an average speed of 30 km/hr, starting at the origin.
Draw a second line from the origin to 70km at time (2.67 + 0.71) hrs.
Now draw a third line, from the end of the second, representing a speed of 40 km/h.

When the 1st and 3rd lines intersect, we have the answer.

You should be able to find the equation of the 1st and 3rd lines and solve algebraically to get the answer you seek.
 
PeterO said:
I would sketch a graph for guidance.

You know how long the vehicle has been traveling for so far, and how far away it currently is. From that can deduce the "other way" of getting there at the right time, just travel 70 km East at a steady speed of (what ever).

Now the graph:

Draw a single line representing an average speed of 30 km/hr, starting at the origin.
Draw a second line from the origin to 70km at time (2.67 + 0.71) hrs.
Now draw a third line, from the end of the second, representing a speed of 40 km/h.

When the 1st and 3rd lines intersect, we have the answer.

You should be able to find the equation of the 1st and 3rd lines and solve algebraically to get the answer you seek.

OR:

Imagine if a second vehicle, traveling at 30km/h East, began at the same time as you. After (2.67 + 0.71) hours, that vehicle will be 30*(2.67 +0.71) km from the start, you are only 120 - 50 km from the start. That shows how far in front the other vehicle would be at that time.
From that time, you are traveling 10 km/hr faster than the first car. How long will it take you to catch up to the other car then?
 
Thanks for the help, I finally got it.
 
Last edited:
canucks81 said:
Thanks for the help, I finally got it.

Note: if you retain the times as fractions [8/3, 5/7] the final answer is 22/7 which you would recognise as the Junior maths approximation of pi, and so 3.14.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top