Finding time using Impulsive forces and momentum

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
WarOwk

Homework Statement


A rocket, weighing 43,600N, has an engine that provides an upward force of 120,000N. It reaches a maximum speed of 860 m/s. For how much time must the engine burn during launch in order to reach this speed?

Homework Equations


p=m*Δv
i=F*t

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by using 120,000N as the Force. I used 43,600 as the mass and 860 as the velocity. I multiplied 43,600 by 860 to get 37,496,00. I then divided the momentum(37,496,000) by the force(120,000) to solve for time. The solution I got was 312.5 seconds. Our teacher has already given us the answer to the problem which is 31.8 seconds, but there is an upcoming test and I would like to know how he got this answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
George Jones said:
Clue: 312.5/31.8 = 9.8
I think I figured it out. Momentum is measured in kg*m/s, but the mass is measured in Newtons. So, you divide the 312.5 by 9.8 to get it in correct units. When I divided the 43,600 N first I got the same answer. The quote helped. Thank You!
 
I think I understand it now, weight is the gravitational force of an object. It's equation is (9.8N/kg * mass), and mass is the weight divided by 9.8 N/kg because it is the amount of stuff on an object. Mass and weight are inversely related to each other.
 
WarOwk said:
mass is the weight divided by 9.8 N/kg
Yes, but that is not how mass is defined. "Mass" generally means inertial mass and is defined as resistance to linear acceleration. If a firce F is applied to a mass and the resulting acceleration is a then the mass is F/a.
It turns out that inertial mass is proportional to gravitational mass, but there is no known reason the universe had to be that way.
WarOwk said:
Mass and weight are inversely related to each other.
No, directly proportional, not inversely.