Finding Uncertainty in a coefficient with a Chi Squared Test

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the uncertainty in the parameter B of a function Ysim=Acos(B*X) using a Chi Squared test applied to neutron flux measurements. The method proposed involves adjusting parameter B until the Chi Squared value increases by one, which is suggested to yield the uncertainty in B. The mathematical foundation is supported by the relationship between Chi Squared distribution, degrees of freedom, and standard deviation calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the Chi Squared statistic and its application in experimental data analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Chi Squared tests and their applications in statistical analysis.
  • Familiarity with the concept of degrees of freedom in statistical distributions.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between observed and expected values in hypothesis testing.
  • Proficiency in using Excel Solver for optimization problems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and application of the Chi Squared statistic in experimental physics.
  • Learn about the calculation of uncertainties in parameters using the method of profile likelihood.
  • Explore advanced statistical software tools like R or Python for performing Chi Squared tests.
  • Investigate the implications of varying degrees of freedom on Chi Squared distribution and its applications.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in experimental physics, statisticians, and data analysts looking to understand uncertainty quantification in parameter estimation using Chi Squared tests.

neutrino45
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have done a chi squared test on the measurements from a neutron flux experiment to get the best parameters for a function of the form Ysim=Acos(B*X). I used Solver in Excel to find the minimum parameters. The test takes the form

chi^2 / dof = SUM(Ysim-Yi)^2/(sigma i)^2

Where Yi are the measured values of the flux at various heights and (sigma i) is the uncertainty in flux i.

What I want to do is to find the uncertainty in the parameter B. I have been told that if I shift the parameter B until the minimum value of chi^2 is altered to get chi^2 + 1 then the difference between the original value for B and the new value for B can be used to get the uncertainty in B.

Does this make any kind of mathematical sense? I've found hints that this is equivalent to garbageing chi^2 by one standard deviation but I have not found any hard evidence of this. Has anyone seen this method referenced anywhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neutrino45 said:
Does this make any kind of mathematical sense? I've found hints that this is equivalent to garbageing chi^2 by one standard deviation but I have not found any hard evidence of this. Has anyone seen this method referenced anywhere?

The [tex]\chi^{2}[/tex] distribution has only one parameter: k, which is the number of degrees of freedom. The mean is simply k, the variance is 2k. The shifting of the parameter by one would correspond to adding or subtracting one degree of freedom.

I can't speak to your application but the standard deviation "sd" (as a measure of uncertainty) is calculated from the sampling distribution and employed in the calculation of the chi square statistic:

[tex]\chi^{2}= [n-1]sd^{2}]/\sigma^{2}[/tex] where [tex]\sigma^{2}[/tex] is the population variance, n is the sample size. Generally the population variance is not known and the estimate from the sampling distribution is used. So this reduces to [tex]\chi^{2}=(O-E)^{2}/{E}[/tex] for each degree of freedom with O as the observed value and E as the expected value.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K