Finding X & Y Intercept of y= cos(e^(-x) + 2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the x and y intercepts of the function y = cos(e^(-x) + 2). To determine the x-intercept, participants agree that setting y = 0 leads to solving the equation cos(e^(-x) + 2) = 0. The critical insight is that the cosine function equals zero at angles of the form x = π/2 + kπ, where k is any integer. The lack of a specified range for x indicates that there are infinitely many x-intercepts, as the cosine function is periodic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions, specifically the cosine function.
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of radians and how they relate to angles in trigonometry.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills, including logarithms.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the periodic properties of the cosine function and its implications for intercepts.
  • Learn about solving transcendental equations involving trigonometric and exponential functions.
  • Explore the concept of ranges and domains in functions to understand intercepts better.
  • Investigate the natural logarithm and its applications in solving equations involving e.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and trigonometry, as well as anyone interested in solving complex equations involving trigonometric and exponential functions.

jacy
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have to find x and y intercept of this function

y= cos(e^(-x) + 2)

This is what i have done so far, to find the x intercept i put y= 0

0= cos(e^(-x) + 2)

can i use Cos (A+B)= CosA CosB - SinA SinB here
if i use that then i get

0= cos e^(-x) cos2 - sin e^(-x) sin2

i don't know what to do next. Please help, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is the cos function zero?

The argment of the cos must be that which makes cos(a)=0.
 
Integral said:
Where is the cos function zero?

The argment of the cos must be that which makes cos(a)=0.

cos function is zero at 90 degrees. How does that help.
 
1) I believe you will need to use radians to solve this problem, because it will not really make sense to carry out algebraic manipulations using an angle in degrees.

2) To find the x-intercept, we need to solve the equation cos(e^{-x} + 2)\ =\ 0. First consider the equation cos(y)\ =\ 0, then see how this can be used to solve the more complicated equation. I don't think the compound angle formula is really needed in this question.

3) Does the question give you a range of x values for which the function is defined? If not, how many x-intercepts can there be? Also, it may be helpful to take note of the range of values e^{-x} can take.
 
Last edited:
Have you found out the y-intercept (which is pretty easier) yet?
------------
In most calculus problems, the angle is in radians, so we don't really use degrees here.
\cos x = 0 \Leftrightarrow x = \frac{\pi}{2} + k \pi, \ k \in \mathbb{Z}
Now, just take one minute to look at the unit circle to see if you can get it.
Now if \cos (e ^ {-x} + 2) = 0
What should e-x + 2 equal?
Can you go from here? :)
 
Thanks pizzasky and VietDao29. No range of x values is given.

(e ^ {-x} + 2) = \frac{\pi}{2}

(e ^ {-x} ) = \frac{\pi}{2} - 2

{-x} = \log \frac{\pi}{2} - 2

So if i substitute the value of -x in the equation i get

cos(pi/2) = 0
 
Last edited:
However, cosine is periodic. The graph of y= cos(x) crosses the x-axis an infinite number of times and so has an infinite number "x-intercepts".
If no range was given for x, cos(e^{-x}+2)= 0 when e^{-x}+ 2= 2n\pi+ \frac{\pi}{2} or e^{-x}+2= 2n\pi- \frac{\pi}{2} where n can be any integer.
 
I do not quite agree with your statement " -x = \log \frac{\pi}{2} - 2". Shouldn't the natural logarithm be used, instead of "log"?

Also, since no range of x values is given, how many x-intercepts can there be? Take a look at VietDao29's post for a hint!
 
pizzasky said:
I do not quite agree with your statement " -x = \log \frac{\pi}{2} - 2". Shouldn't the natural logarithm be used, instead of "log"?
Many "advanced" text (beyond calculus) use "log x" to mean the natural logarithm and don't mention the common logarithm.

Also, since no range of x values is given, how many x-intercepts can there be? Take a look at VietDao29's post for a hint!
 
  • #10
Reply

Oops, I did not know that...:blushing: But shouldn't it be -x = \log (\frac{\pi}{2} - 2) (which, incidentally, is undefined)?
 
  • #11
Thanks everyone, so there are finite number of x intercepts since no range is given.
 
  • #12
You mean "infinite" number of x intercepts? Whilst there is no limit to the number of x-intercepts, some of the possible intercepts must be rejected. For instance, 1 of the intercepts is calculated to be x = -\log (\frac{\pi}{2} - 2). But is this possible?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
768
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K