Finite abelian group into sequence of subgroups

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the construction of a sequence of subgroups within a finite abelian group G, specifically demonstrating that for each subgroup Hi, the quotient Hi/Hi+1 is cyclic of prime order. The original approach involved reducing the power of a generator in Hi, but the author recognizes the need for a more rigorous proof regarding the cyclic nature of the quotient. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding simple finite abelian groups and the implications of the Sylow theorems in constructing valid subgroup sequences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite abelian groups
  • Knowledge of subgroup properties and cosets
  • Familiarity with cyclic groups and prime order
  • Basic comprehension of Sylow theorems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the structure of finite abelian groups in detail
  • Learn about the construction and properties of simple groups
  • Explore the implications of Sylow theorems on subgroup sequences
  • Investigate examples of groups of order pq and pk for practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in group theory, students studying abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties and structures of finite abelian groups.

jav
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
G finite abelian group

WTS: There exist sequence of subgroups {e} = Hr c ... c H1 c G
such that Hi/Hi+1 is cyclic of prime order for all i.

My original thought was to create Hi+1 by reducing the power of one of the generators of Hi by a prime p. Then the order of Hi/Hi+1 would be p, but not necessarily cyclic.

I also know that a simple finite abelian group is cyclic of prime order, but don't know how to construct simple cosets.

(kiHi+1)(hiHi+1)(kiHi+1)-1 = (hiHi+1) where hi c Hi, ki c Ki c Hi

since G abelian implies the inverse coset commutes.

Then, in order to prove Hi/Hi+1 is simple would be equivalent to showing that the trivial subgroup and itself are the only subgroups. If that were true, then there would only be one valid subgroup of G in the sequence. Ie. the sequence would look like {e} c H c G.

What am I missing here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
there are a couple of "easier" cases you might want to look into first:

|G| = pq, p,q distinct primes.

|G| = pk, p a prime.

the second case is "harder", although you may have proved both of these already if you have covered the sylow theorems.

by the way, any group of prime order is necessarily cyclic (why?).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K