Undergrad Finite square well bound states

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the finite square well potential and its bound states, specifically addressing the relationship between the potential depth \( V_o \), the width \( a \), and the mass \( m \) of the particle. The key equation derived is \( \tan(k_1a)=-\frac{k_1}{k_2} \), where \( k_1=\sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}} \) and \( k_2=\sqrt{\frac{2m(V_o-E)}{\hbar^2}} \). It is established that the number of bound states \( N \) can be approximated by \( V_0 \approx (N-1)^2 \frac{h^2}{32ma^2} \). Solutions can be obtained both graphically and numerically, providing flexibility in analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the time-independent Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with potential wells and bound state concepts.
  • Knowledge of mathematical functions, particularly trigonometric functions like tangent.
  • Experience with numerical methods for solving differential equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore numerical methods for solving the Schrödinger equation in potential wells.
  • Research the implications of varying potential depth \( V_o \) on bound state solutions.
  • Learn about graphical methods for analyzing quantum mechanical systems.
  • Investigate the relationship between quantum states and physical parameters like mass \( m \) and width \( a \).
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists studying potential wells, and researchers interested in bound state analysis and numerical solutions in quantum systems.

andrewtz98
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let's suppose I have a finite potential well: $$
V(x)=
\begin{cases}
\infty,\quad x<0\\
0,\quad 0<x<a\\
V_o,\quad x>a.
\end{cases}
$$

I solved the time-independent Schrödinger equation for each region and after applying the continuity conditions of ##\Psi## and its derivative I ended up with:

$$ \tan(k_1a)=-\frac{k_1}{k_2},$$ where ##k_1=\sqrt{\frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}}## and ##k_2=\sqrt{\frac{2m(V_o-E)}{\hbar^2}}##.

I'm aware of the fact that solutions can only be calculated graphically, but what's the relation between the value of ##V_o## and the bound states? What if I want to find the acceptable values of ##V_o## for the bound states to be ##1,2,3,\dots## or none?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andrewtz98 said:
What if I want to find...
andrewtz98 said:
I'm aware of the fact that solutions can only be calculated graphically

Doesn't that answer your question?

There is a relationship between a, m and V0 and the number of bound states. I doubt it has an analytic form, but the way you get it asking that the Nth state be just on the edge of being bound. If I did it right, for large N,

V_0 \approx (N-1)^2 \frac{h^2}{32ma^2}By the way, graphing is not the only way to find the solutions. You can also do it numerically.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K