MHB Finitely Generated Modules - Bland Problem 1(a), Problem Set 2.2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Problem 1(a) from Paul E. Bland's "Rings and Their Modules," specifically regarding the proof that the external direct sum \( M \bigoplus N \) of finitely generated modules \( M \) and \( N \) is also finitely generated. The proof establishes that if \( M \) and \( N \) are finitely generated, then there exist finite subsets \( X \) and \( Y \) such that \( M = \sum_X x_i R \) and \( N = \sum_Y y_i R \). Consequently, a finite subset \( S \) can be constructed from \( X \) and \( Y \) to demonstrate that \( M \bigoplus N \) is finitely generated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finitely generated modules
  • Familiarity with direct sums and products of modules
  • Knowledge of the notation and operations involving rings and modules
  • Basic proof techniques in abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of finitely generated modules in more depth
  • Explore the concept of direct sums and their applications in module theory
  • Learn about the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain (PID)
  • Review additional problems from Bland's "Rings and Their Modules" to reinforce understanding
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, graduate students studying module theory, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of finitely generated modules and their properties.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book: Rings and Their Modules and am currently focused on Section 2.2 Free Modules ... ...

I need someone to check my solution to the first part of Problem 1(a) of Problem Set 2.2 ...

Problem 1(a) of Problem Set 2.2 reads as follows:
View attachment 8067
My solution/proof of the first part of Problem 1(a) is as follows:
We claim that $$M \bigoplus N$$ is finitely generated ... Now ...

$$M \bigoplus N$$ = the direct product $$M \times N$$ since we are dealing with the external direct sum of a finite number of modules ...

$$M$$ finitely generated $$\Longrightarrow \exists$$ a finite subset $$X \subseteq M$$ such that

$$M = \sum_X x_i R = \{x_1 r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ x_m r_m \mid x_i \in X, r_i \in R \}$$ ... ... ... ... (1)
$$N$$ finitely generated $$\Longrightarrow \exists$$ a finite subset $$Y \subseteq N$$ such that

$$N = \sum_Y y_i R = \{y_1 r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ y_n r_n \mid y_i \in Y, r_i \in R \}$$ ... ... ... ... (2)
$$M \bigoplus N$$ finitely generated $$\Longrightarrow \exists$$ a finite subset $$S \subseteq M \bigoplus N$$ such that

$$M \bigoplus N = \sum_S ( x_i, y_i ) R = \{ (x_1, y_1) r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ ( x_s, y_s) r_s \mid (x_i, y_i) \in S , r_i \in R \} $$$$= \{ (x_1 r_1, y_1 r_1) + \ ... \ ... \ + ( x_s r_s, y_s r_s) \} $$$$= \{ (x_1 r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ + x_s r_s , y_1 r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ + y_s r_s \}$$ ... ... ... ... ... (3)
Now if we take $$s \ge m, n $$ in (3) ... ...Then the sum $$x_1 r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ + x_s r_s$$ ranging over all $$x_i$$ and $$ r_i$$ will generate all the elements in $$ M$$ as the first variable in $$M \bigoplus N $$

... and the sum $$y_1 r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ + y_s r_s$$ ranging over all $$y_i $$and $$r_i $$ will generate all the elements in $$N$$ as the second variable in $$M \bigoplus N $$

Since $$s$$ is finite ... $$M \bigoplus N $$ is finitely generated ...
Can someone please critique my proof and either confirm it to be correct and/or point out the errors and shortcomings ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
We claim that $$M \bigoplus N$$ is finitely generated ...

$$M \bigoplus N$$ = the direct product $$M \times N$$ since we are dealing with the external direct sum of a finite number of modules ...
$$M$$ finitely generated $$\Longrightarrow \exists$$ a finite subset $$X \subseteq M$$ such that
$$M = \sum_X x_i R = \{x_1 r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ x_m r_m \mid x_i \in X, r_i \in R \}$$ ... ... ... ... (1)

$$N$$ finitely generated $$\Longrightarrow \exists$$ a finite subset $$Y \subseteq N$$ such that
$$N = \sum_Y y_i R = \{y_1 r_1 + \ ... \ ... \ y_n r_n \mid y_i \in Y, r_i \in R \}$$ ... ... ... ... (2)
So each $x \in M$ can be written as a finite sum $x = \sum_X x_i r_i$ ($r_i \in R$).
So each $y \in N$ can be written as a finite sum $y = \sum_Y y_i s_i$ ($s_i \in R$).
Peter said:
$$M \bigoplus N$$ finitely generated $$\Longrightarrow \exists$$ a finite subset $$S \subseteq M \bigoplus N$$ such that

This must be: To prove that $M \bigoplus N$ is finitely generated, so we have to prove that there exists a finite subset $S \subseteq M \bigoplus N$ such that $M \bigoplus N = \sum_S z_i R$.

I think it has to be this way:
Define $X'=\{ (x_i, 0) | x_i \in X \}$ and $Y'=\{ (0, y_i) | y_i \in Y \}$ and $Z=X' \cup Y'$. Then $Z \subset M \bigoplus N$ and $Z$ is finite.

Take $z \in M \bigoplus N$, then $z=(m,n)$ with $m \in M$ and $n \in N$.
$m$ can be written as $m = \sum_X x_i r_i$ and $n$ can be written as $n = \sum_Y y_i s_i$.

Then $z = (m,n) = (\sum_X x_i r_i, \sum_Y y_i s_i) = (\sum_X x_i r_i, 0) + (0, \sum_Y y_i s_i) = \sum_X (x_i, 0)r_i + \sum_Y (0, y_i)s_i = \sum_{X'} x'_i r_i +\sum_{Y'} y'_i s_i = \sum_Z z_i t_i$

in which $x'_i=(x_i, 0) \in X'$ and $y'_i=(0, y_i) \in Y'$ and $t_i \in R$.

This proves that $M \bigoplus N$ is finitely generated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K