Firing a bullet into a bock suspended by a string Help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The initial velocity of a bullet fired into a block suspended by a string is calculated to be approximately 491 m/s. This conclusion is derived from applying the principles of conservation of momentum and energy. The bullet, weighing 50.0 g, embeds itself into a stationary 10.0 kg block, which reaches a maximum angle of 40.0° after the collision. The height change, calculated as Δh = 1.3 - 1.3cos(40°), is critical for determining the potential energy converted to kinetic energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy equations
  • Knowledge of basic trigonometry for angle calculations
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of momentum in elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Learn about energy transformations in mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of angle and height in projectile motion
  • Investigate real-world applications of ballistic calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of collisions and energy conservation in mechanical systems.

StonedPhysicist
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hey guys apparently the answer to this is 491 m/s, but i keep getting 34m/s by using a method whereby i find out the height reached by the block then using kinetic energy to potential energy... doesn't seem to work tho! Please help!

A 50.0 g bullet is fired into a stationary 10.0 kg block suspended on a light inextensible wire of length 1.3 m. If the bullet becomes fully embedded in the block, and the bullet-block system reaches a maximum angle of 40.0◦, find the initial velocity of the bullet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\delta h## is given by 1.3-1.3cos(40), and ##g\delta h = \frac{1}{2} v_i^2## (conservation of energy, where ##v_i## is the initial velocity of the block+bullet). The total momentum before and after the collision stays the same as well, so you should be able to figure out why the velocity of the bullet had a magnitude of approximately 491 m/s before the collision.
 
Show your work, and it will make it easier to see what's going on.
 
PWiz said:
##\delta h## is given by 1.3-1.3cos(40), and ##g\delta h = \frac{1}{2} v_i^2## (conservation of energy, where ##v_i## is the initial velocity of the block+bullet). The total momentum before and after the collision stays the same as well, so you should be able to figure out why the velocity of the bullet had a magnitude of approximately 491 m/s before the collision.
I am pretty sure i did this method, and ended up with a result of 34m/s, not sure that method can work for some reason
 
@StonedPhysicist The method worked just fine for me. Why don't you show your working? As Bystander said, it would make things much easier.
 
using v=√((2(m+M)gh)/m) , where m=0.05 kg M=10kg g=9.81 and h = 0.3...m i get 34m/s?
 
Why are you taking a square root for m as well?
 
PWiz said:
Why are you taking a square root for m as well?
i am just rearranging (m+M)gh=1/2 mv2
 
The kinetic energy should be given by ##\frac{1}{2} (M+m) v^2##. The gain in PE of the block+bullet equals to the KE the block+bullet possessed right after collision. The equation resolves to what I previously provided. So applying conservation of momentum, we get ##mv_1=Mv_2## , so ##v_1=\frac{M}{m} \sqrt{2g\delta h}## .
 
  • #10
PWiz said:
The kinetic energy should be given by ##\frac{1}{2} (M+m) v^2##. The gain in PE of the block+bullet equals to the KE the block+bullet possessed right after collision. The equation resolves to what I previously provided. So applying conservation of momentum, we get ##mv_1=Mv_2## , so ##v_1=\frac{M}{m} \sqrt{2g\delta h}## .
ah I see now! thankyou!
 
  • #11
StonedPhysicist said:
I am pretty sure i did this method
No you didn't. As PWiz wrote, you use the energy equation to find the speed of block+bullet just after impact. There is work loss in the impact so you cannot use energy to relate it back to the speed of the bullet before impact. You have to use conservation of momentum for that.

Edit: I see you figured it out as I was typing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K