Normalisation constants with ladder operators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization constants associated with ladder operators in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the harmonic oscillator states. Participants explore the relationships between the states generated by the ladder operators and their normalization constants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the relationship between the action of the raising operator on the wave functions and the resulting states, questioning the normalization constants involved. There are attempts to derive expressions for the wave functions and their normalization based on the properties of the ladder operators.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct form of the normalization constants and the relationships between the states. Some participants express uncertainty about previous calculations and seek clarification on the definitions of the operators involved. Multiple interpretations of the operator definitions are being discussed, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference a specific definition of the raising operator from an older edition of a textbook, which may differ from more modern definitions. This raises questions about the consistency of terminology and definitions in the context of the problem.

etotheipi
Homework Statement
The wave function of a particle in a harmonic potential is an expansion of terms of the form$$\psi_n(x) = A_n (a_+)^n e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar }x^2}$$Determine the coefficients ##A_n##

Answer: $$A_n = \left (\frac{m\omega}{\pi \hbar} \right)^{\frac{1}{4}} \frac{(-i)^n}{\sqrt{n!(\hbar \omega)^n}}$$
Relevant Equations
N/A
The previous part was to show that ##a_+ \psi_n = i\sqrt{(n+1)\hbar \omega} \psi_{n+1}##, which I just did by looking at$$\int |a_+ \psi_n|^2 dx = \int \psi_n^* (a_{-} a_+ \psi_n) dx = E+\frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega = \hbar \omega(n+1)$$so the constant of proportionality between ##a_+ \psi_n## and ##\psi_{n+1}## will have modulus ##\sqrt{\hbar \omega(n+1)}##. Then it asks to determine the normalisation constant ##A_n##, so I looked at the lowest energy state first$$\psi_0 = A_0 e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}x^2}$$ $$\int |\psi_0|^2 dx = |A_0|^2 \int e^{-\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}x^2} dx = |A_0|^2 \sqrt{\frac{\pi \hbar}{m\omega}} = 1 \implies |A_0| = \left (\frac{m\omega}{\pi \hbar} \right)^{\frac{1}{4}}$$where I used the result for the Gaussian integral without proof. Then I just assumed that since ##\psi## can always be taken to be real, we can just take ##A_0 = \left (\frac{m\omega}{\pi \hbar} \right)^{\frac{1}{4}}##. Then using the previous result, we would have$$\psi_n = \left( \frac{a_+}{i\sqrt{\hbar \omega(n+1)}} \right)^n \left (\frac{m\omega}{\pi \hbar} \right)^{\frac{1}{4}} e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar}x^2}$$Edit: On second thoughts, this equation is obviously incorrect, because I don't account for the fact that ##n## is different (not constant) each time we apply the operator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not an area I know anything about, but I see you need a factorial in the answer, and you have some relationship between ##a_+ψ_n## and ##ψ_{n+1}## that involves a factor n+1. This suggests finding the relationship between ##(a_+)^{n+1}ψ_0## and ##ψ_{n+1}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
@haruspex you are absolutely right, I realize my mistake... it should be$$\psi_n = A_n (a_+)^n e^{-\frac{m\omega}{2\hbar }x^2} = \frac{A_n}{A_0} (a_+)^n \psi_0$$and then we expand it up to ##\psi_n##, using the fact that ##a_+ \psi_0 = i\sqrt{\hbar \omega} \psi_1##, ##a_+ \psi_1 = i\sqrt{2\hbar \omega} \psi_2##, etc. so that$$\psi_n = \frac{A_n}{A_0} (i\sqrt{\hbar \omega})(i\sqrt{2\hbar \omega})\dots(i\sqrt{n\hbar \omega}) = \frac{A_n}{A_0} i^n \sqrt{n! (\hbar \omega)^2}$$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
etotheipi said:
The previous part was to show that ##a_+ \psi_n = i\sqrt{(n+1)\hbar \omega} \psi_{n+1}##, which I just did by looking at$$\int |a_+ \psi_n|^2 dx = \int \psi_n^* (a_{-} a_+ \psi_n) dx = E+\frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega = \hbar \omega(n+1)$$so the constant of proportionality between ##a_+ \psi_n## and ##\psi_{n+1}## will have modulus ##\sqrt{\hbar \omega(n+1)}##.

Are you sure about that?
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
PeroK said:
Are you sure about that?

I was... but not so much any more! The schroedinger equation in ladder operator form looks like$$(a_+ a_- - \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega) \psi_n = E_n \psi_n$$So I said that$$\int (a_+ \psi_n)^* (a_+ \psi_n) dx = \int \psi_n^* (a_+ a_- \psi_n) dx = (E_n + \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega) \int \psi_n^* \psi_n dx = (E_n + \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega) = \hbar \omega (n+1)$$We are to expect that ##a_+ \psi_n = c\psi_{n+1}##, so $$\int |c|^2 |\psi_{n}|^2 dx = |c|^2$$and the modulus of the proportionality constant would be$$|c| = \sqrt{\hbar \omega(n+1)}$$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
etotheipi said:
I was... but not so much any more! The schroedinger equation in ladder operator form looks like$$(a_+ a_- + \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega) \psi_n = E_n \psi_n$$So I said that$$\int (a_+ \psi_n)^* (a_+ \psi_n) dx = \int \psi_n^* (a_+ a_- \psi_n) dx = (E_n + \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega) \int \psi_n^* \psi_n dx = (E_n + \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega) = \hbar \omega (n+1)$$We are to expect that ##a_+ \psi_n = c\psi_{n+1}##, so $$\int |c|^2 |\psi_{n}|^2 dx = |c|^2$$and the modulus of the proportionality constant would be$$|c| = \sqrt{\hbar \omega(n+1)}$$
Usually we have:
$$a_+ \psi_n = \sqrt{n+1} \psi_{n+1}$$
You must be using something non-standard somewhere.

PS It must be the definition of ##a_+##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
etotheipi said:
The previous part was to show that ##a_+ \psi_n = i\sqrt{(n+1)\hbar \omega} \psi_{n+1}##,

I haven't seen this before. Where is this from out of interest?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
PeroK said:
I haven't seen this before. Where is this from out of interest?

Here is the original problem statement for the first part:

1596895348529.png


PeroK said:
PS It must be the definition of ##a_+##.

For trouble-shooting purposes, Griffiths has defined ##a_+## to be the operator$$a_+ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m}} \left( \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{d}{dx} + I am \omega x\right)$$
 
etotheipi said:
Here is the original problem statement for the first part:

View attachment 267474
For trouble-shooting purposes, Griffiths has defined ##a_+## to be the operator$$a_+ = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m}} \left( \frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{d}{dx} + I am \omega x\right)$$
Is that an old edition?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #10
Yeah, it's older than me. I wonder what the more modern definition of the ladder operators are?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K