First order perturbation question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves first order perturbation theory in quantum mechanics, specifically applying a delta function potential in the context of an infinite square well. The original poster seeks to find corrections to energy levels and wave functions due to this perturbation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the first order energy correction and expresses confusion regarding the summation in the wave function correction. They question the impact of orthogonality on the terms in the sum.
  • Another participant provides a calculation for one of the integrals involved, questioning whether the approach is correct given the orthogonality of the wave functions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of orthogonality on the terms of the wave function correction. Some guidance has been offered regarding the evaluation of the integral, but no consensus has been reached on the overall approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of perturbation theory and the specific conditions of the problem, including the implications of the delta function potential and the orthogonality of the wave functions involved.

Bobbo Snap
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose we put a delta function bump in the center of the infinite square well:
<br /> H&#039; = \alpha \delta(x -a/2),<br />
where \alpha is constant.

a) Find the first order correction to the allowed energies.

b) Find the first three non-zero terms in the expansion of the correction to the ground state, \psi_1^1.

Homework Equations



First order correction to the energy:
E_n^1 = \langle \psi_n^0 | H&#039; | \psi_n^0 \rangle.

First order correction to the wave function:
\psi_n^1 = \sum_{m \neq n} \frac{\langle \psi_m^0 | H&#039; | \psi_n^0 \rangle}{(E_n^0 - E_m^0)}\psi_m^0.

Wavefunction for the infinite square well:
\psi_n(x) = \sqrt{2/a} \sin{\frac{n \pi}{a}x}

Energy for the infinite square well:
E_n = \frac{n^2 \pi^2 \hbar^2}{2ma^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I got part a right. It worked out to \frac{2 \alpha}{a} for odd n and 0 for even n.

Part b has me a little confused. In the equation for the first order correction to the wavefunction, what am I supposed to sum over? If it is m, then the first three terms are m=3, m=5, m=7 since m is not n and m must be odd. But then I have \langle \psi_3^0 |H&#039;|\psi_1^0\rangle, \langle \psi_5^0 |H&#039;| \psi_1^0 \rangle, \text{ and } \langle \psi_7^0 |H&#039;| \psi_1^0 \rangle in the numerators of the first three terms. But wouldn't orthogonality then make all of these terms zero so there would be no non-zero terms in the expansion? I'm not understanding how to evaluate this sum. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bobbo Snap said:
Part b has me a little confused. In the equation for the first order correction to the wavefunction, what am I supposed to sum over? If it is m, then the first three terms are m=3, m=5, m=7 since m is not n and m must be odd. But then I have \langle \psi_3^0 |H&#039;|\psi_1^0\rangle, \langle \psi_5^0 |H&#039;| \psi_1^0 \rangle, \text{ and } \langle \psi_7^0 |H&#039;| \psi_1^0 \rangle in the numerators of the first three terms. But wouldn't orthogonality then make all of these terms zero so there would be no non-zero terms in the expansion? I'm not understanding how to evaluate this sum. Any help would be appreciated.

What does \langle \psi_3^0 |H&#039;|\psi_1^0\rangle look like when written out as an integral?
 
\langle \psi_3^0|H&#039;|\psi_1^0 \rangle = \frac{2 \alpha}{a}\int \sin{\frac{3 \pi x}{a}} \sin{\frac{\pi x}{a}} \delta(x - a/2) = \frac{2 \alpha}{a} \sin{\frac{3 \pi}{2}} \sin{\frac{\pi }{2}} = - \frac{2 \alpha}{a}

I worked out something like this for all three terms (m=3, m=5, m=7). Is that the correct approach? I thought orthogonality might make this go to zero.
 
Looks right to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K