Anharmonic oscillator first-order correction to energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the first-order correction to the wave-functions of an anharmonic oscillator, specifically focusing on the perturbation Hamiltonian given by ##H'=ax^3+bx^4##.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the formula for the first-order correction to the wave-function but expresses confusion regarding the contribution of the cubic term. They question the orthogonality of states and the resulting coefficients. Other participants suggest considering the non-orthogonality of certain states and provide insights into the expansion of the operator.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring the implications of orthogonality in the context of the perturbation theory. Some guidance has been offered regarding the non-zero contributions from specific terms in the operator expansion, but no consensus has been reached on the final interpretation.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes considerations of operator expansions and the implications of state orthogonality, which are central to the problem but may not be fully resolved due to the complexity of the perturbation theory involved.

vbrasic
Messages
71
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


I have ##H'=ax^3+bx^4##, and wish to find the general perturbed wave-functions.

Homework Equations


First-order correction to the wave-function is given by, $$\psi_n^{(1)}=\Sigma_{m\neq n}\frac{\langle\psi_m^{(0)}|H'|\psi_n^{(0)}\rangle}{n-m}|\psi_m^{(0)}\rangle.$$

The Attempt at a Solution


The formula becomes (focusing exclusively on the cubic term), $$\psi_n^{(1)}=\Sigma_{m\neq n}\frac{\langle\psi_m^{(0)}|ax^3|\psi_n^{(0)}\rangle}{n-m}|\psi_m^{(0)}\rangle.$$

(I shall denote, ##|\psi_{n,m}^{(0)}\rangle## as ##|n,m\rangle## to avoid typesetting overly complicated formulas. Using the ladder operator definition of ##x## then, I have, $$|n^{(1)}\rangle=\frac{a(\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}^{3/2})}{\hbar\omega}\Sigma_{m\neq n}\frac{\langle m|(a+a^+)^3|n\rangle}{n-m}|m\rangle.$$

Now the trouble is, according to my textbook, the cubic term contributes a first-order correction to the wavefunction, but I'm not seeing it. There would never be an equal number of raising and lowering operators, such that by orthogonality all the coefficients would become ##0##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vbrasic said:
There would never be an equal number of raising and lowering operators, such that by orthogonality all the coefficients would become 00.
You seem to forget that ##|n\rangle## and ##|m\rangle## are different states. For example Something like ##\langle n+3|(a^+)^3| n \rangle \neq 0##.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
You seem to forget that ##|n\rangle## and ##|m\rangle## are different states. For example Something like ##\langle n+3|(a^+)^3| n \rangle \neq 0##.
Oh, okay, I see. So first, I'd expand the operator as, $$(a+a^+)=aa+aa^++a^+a+a^+a^+(a+a^+)^3=aaa+aaa^++aa^+a+aa^+a^++a^+aa+a^+aa^++a^+a^+a+a^+a^+a^+.$$
Then say for the first term, ##m=n-3## in order for them to be non-orthogonal, such that the coeffiecient is $$\frac{\sqrt{n}\sqrt{n-1}\sqrt{n-2}}{3}.$$

Is that right?
 
vbrasic said:
Is that right?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K