Linear perturbation to harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the first-order corrections to the energy and wavefunction of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator subjected to a linear perturbation represented by ##H'=ax##. Participants are exploring the implications of perturbation theory in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the first-order corrections, noting that the energy correction appears to be zero due to orthogonality. They express the wavefunction correction and question their understanding of the perturbation theory process.
  • Some participants question the applicability of the derived expressions for different quantum states, particularly for the ground state ##n=0##, and discuss the implications of raising and lowering operators.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing feedback on the original poster's reasoning and clarifying the conditions under which certain expressions hold. There is a recognition of the need to consider special cases, such as the ground state, without reaching a consensus on the final interpretation.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the limitations of the derived expressions, particularly regarding the ground state ##n=0##, and how the definitions of raising and lowering operators affect the results. Participants are navigating through the nuances of perturbation theory without resolving all uncertainties.

vbrasic
Messages
71
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Find the first-order corrections to energy and the wavefunction, for a 1D harmonic oscillator which is linearly perturbed by ##H'=ax##.

Homework Equations


First-order correction to the energy is given by, ##E^{(1)}=\langle n|H'|n\rangle##, while first-order correction to the wave-function is, $$|n^{(1)}\rangle=\Sigma_{m\neq n}\frac{\langle m|H'|n\rangle}{E_n-E_m}|m\rangle.$$

The Attempt at a Solution


The energy correction is just ##0## by orthogonality arguments. For the corrections to the wavefunction, I have, $$|n^{(1)}\rangle=\frac{a\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}}{\hbar\omega}\Sigma_{m\neq n}\frac{\langle m|a+a^+|n\rangle}{n-m}|m\rangle.$$ The first term within the summation is only exists for ##m=n-1##, such that the term becomes, ##\sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle##. Similarly, the second term in the summation only exists for ##m=n+1##, such that the term becomes,##-\sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle##. Hence, the first order correction should be, $$\frac{a\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}}{\hbar\omega}(\sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle-\sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle).$$ I am not sure however, as I'm still getting my feet wet with perturbation theory and would like to know if I'm on the correct track.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine, except that the last expression is applicable only for ##n>0##. What about the one for ##n=0##?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Looks fine, except that the last expression is applicable only for ##n>0##. What about the one for ##n=0##?
For, ##n=0##, I'm thinking that the term involving the ##|n-1\rangle## would just go to ##0## by definition of the raising/lowering operators. Would that be correct?
 
vbrasic said:
For, ##n=0##, I'm thinking that the term involving the ##|n-1\rangle## would just go to ##0## by definition of the raising/lowering operators. Would that be correct?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K