MHB Five, Phi and Pi in one integral = −5ϕπ

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tony1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Phi Pi
AI Thread Summary
The integral $$\int_{0}^{\pi/2} \frac{\ln(\sin^2 x)}{\sin(2x)} \cdot \sqrt[5]{\tan(x)} \, dx$$ is proposed to equal $$-5\phi\pi$$, where $\phi$ is the golden ratio. Some participants question the validity of this result, suggesting an alternative outcome of $$-\frac{5\pi}{\phi}$$. A key point of discussion revolves around the relationship between sine values and the golden ratio, specifically noting that $$\sin(\pi/10) = \frac{1}{2\phi}$$. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the integral's evaluation and the potential error in the proposed result.
Tony1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
$$\int_{0}^{\pi\over 2}{\ln(\sin^2 x)\over \sin(2x)}\cdot \sqrt[5]{\tan(x)}\mathrm dx=-5\phi \pi$$

$\phi$ is the golden ratio

Make $u=\tan x$

$${1\over 2}\int_{0}^{\infty}u^{-{4\over 5}}\ln\left({1+u^2\over u^2}\right)\mathrm du$$

hmmm, too complicate to continue.
Any help, please. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is there an error in the result? I'm getting

$$I = \int_{0}^{\pi\over 2}{\ln(\sin^2 x)\over \sin(2x)}\cdot \sqrt[5]{\tan(x)}\mathrm dx = -\frac{5 \pi}{\phi}$$.
 
Theia said:
Is there an error in the result? I'm getting

$$I = \int_{0}^{\pi\over 2}{\ln(\sin^2 x)\over \sin(2x)}\cdot \sqrt[5]{\tan(x)}\mathrm dx = -\frac{5 \pi}{\phi}$$.

Taking your substitution $$u = \tan x$$, one obtains

$$I = -\frac{1}{2}\int _0^{\infty}u^{-4/5}\ln \left( \frac{1+u^2}{u^2} \right) \mathrm d u$$.

Now taking $$\frac{1+u^2}{u^2} = q$$, the integral becomes

$$I = -\frac{1}{4}\int _1 ^{\infty} \ln q \ (q - 1)^{-11/10} \mathrm dq.$$

Let's then integrate by parts ($$ \mathrm d f = \ln q$$) and one obtains

$$I = -\frac{5}{2}\int _1 ^{\infty} q^{-1} \ (q - 1)^{-1/10} \mathrm dq.$$

One more substitution: $$1 - \dfrac{1}{q} = p$$ and one obtains

$$I = -\frac{5}{2}\int _0 ^1 p^{-1/10} \ (1 - p)^{-9/10} \mathrm dp.$$

By definition of the Beta function one reads this as

$$I =-\frac{5}{2} \beta \left( \frac{9}{10}, \frac{1}{10} \right) = -\frac{5}{2} \frac{\pi}{\sin \tfrac{\pi}{10}} = -\frac{5\pi}{\phi}$$.
 
Last edited:
Theia said:
Taking your substitution $$u = \tan x$$, one obtains

$$I = -\frac{1}{2}\int _0^{\infty}u^{-4/5}\ln \left( \frac{1+u^2}{u^2} \right) \mathrm d u$$.

Now taking $$\frac{1+u^2}{u^2} = q$$, the integral becomes

$$I = -\frac{1}{4}\int _1 ^{\infty} \ln q \ (q - 1)^{-11/10} \mathrm dq.$$

Let's then integrate by parts ($$ \mathrm d f = \ln q$$) and one obtains

$$I = -\frac{5}{2}\int _1 ^{\infty} q^{-1} \ (q - 1)^{-1/10} \mathrm dq.$$

One more substitution: $$1 - \dfrac{1}{q} = p$$ and one obtains

$$I = -\frac{5}{2}\int _0 ^1 p^{-1/10} \ (1 - p)^{-9/10} \mathrm dp.$$

By definition of the Beta function one reads this as

$$I =-\frac{5}{2} \beta \left( \frac{9}{10}, \frac{1}{10} \right) = -\frac{5}{2} \frac{\pi}{\sin \tfrac{\pi}{10}} = -\frac{5\pi}{\phi}$$.

Note $$\sin(\pi/10)={1\over 2\phi}$$

$$-{5\over 2}\cdot {\pi\over \sin(\pi/10)}=-5\pi\phi$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top