MHB Flight path angle concept question

AI Thread Summary
A flight path angle of 356 degrees can be interpreted as 4 degrees when defined as the angle between the flight path vector and the horizon. This interpretation arises from the relationship that angles can be expressed in a circular manner, where 356 degrees is equivalent to a negative angle of -4 degrees. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the definition used for flight path angles, suggesting a standard range between -180 and +180 degrees. Additionally, a mathematical formula for calculating the flight path angle is provided, involving the true anomaly and eccentricity of the orbit. Understanding these definitions and calculations is crucial for accurate discussions on flight path angles.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Can a flight path angle be 356 degrees?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
Can a flight path angle be 356 degrees?

Hi dwsmith, :)

Depends on the way it's defined I presume. If it's defined as, angle between the flight path vector and the horizon (refer >>this<<) then 356 degrees will be the same as 360-356=4 degrees.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Sudharaka said:
Hi dwsmith, :)

Depends on the way it's defined I presume. If it's defined as, angle between the flight path vector and the horizon (refer >>this<<) then 356 degrees will be the same as 360-356=4 degrees.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.

Originally it was -4 so I added 360 to get the positive. So I can then subtract and say it is positive?
 
dwsmith said:
Originally it was -4 so I added 360 to get the positive. So I can then subtract and say it is positive?

Where did you encounter this question and can you please tell us how the flight path angle is defined in the book that you use? I presume that it is defined as an angle in-between -180 and +180.
 
Sudharaka said:
Where did you encounter this question and can you please tell us how the flight path angle is defined in the book that you use? I presume that it is defined as an angle in-between -180 and +180.

$$
\gamma = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{e\sin\nu}{1 + e\cos\nu}\right)
$$
where $\nu$ is the true anomaly and e is the eccentricity of the orbit.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top