Flight path angle concept question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The flight path angle can indeed be expressed as 356 degrees, which is equivalent to 4 degrees when considering its definition as the angle between the flight path vector and the horizon. This conversion is achieved by subtracting 360 from 356. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the specific definition of flight path angle, which is typically constrained between -180 and +180 degrees. The mathematical representation of the flight path angle is given by the formula involving true anomaly and eccentricity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of flight dynamics and vector analysis
  • Familiarity with angular measurements in aviation
  • Knowledge of mathematical functions, specifically trigonometry
  • Basic grasp of orbital mechanics concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definition and applications of flight path angle in aviation
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the flight path angle formula
  • Learn about the significance of true anomaly and eccentricity in orbital mechanics
  • Explore angular conversions and their implications in flight dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, flight dynamics researchers, and students studying aviation mathematics will benefit from this discussion.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Can a flight path angle be 356 degrees?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
Can a flight path angle be 356 degrees?

Hi dwsmith, :)

Depends on the way it's defined I presume. If it's defined as, angle between the flight path vector and the horizon (refer >>this<<) then 356 degrees will be the same as 360-356=4 degrees.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Sudharaka said:
Hi dwsmith, :)

Depends on the way it's defined I presume. If it's defined as, angle between the flight path vector and the horizon (refer >>this<<) then 356 degrees will be the same as 360-356=4 degrees.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.

Originally it was -4 so I added 360 to get the positive. So I can then subtract and say it is positive?
 
dwsmith said:
Originally it was -4 so I added 360 to get the positive. So I can then subtract and say it is positive?

Where did you encounter this question and can you please tell us how the flight path angle is defined in the book that you use? I presume that it is defined as an angle in-between -180 and +180.
 
Sudharaka said:
Where did you encounter this question and can you please tell us how the flight path angle is defined in the book that you use? I presume that it is defined as an angle in-between -180 and +180.

$$
\gamma = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{e\sin\nu}{1 + e\cos\nu}\right)
$$
where $\nu$ is the true anomaly and e is the eccentricity of the orbit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
861
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K