Flipping signs for limits at negative infinity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the expression \(\lim_{x \to -\infty} x + \sqrt{x^2 + 6x}\) evaluates to -3. The discussion highlights a method of flipping the sign by substituting \(-u\) for \(x\), transforming the limit into \(\lim_{x \to \infty} -x + \sqrt{x^2 + 6x}\). This approach is intuitive as the expression under the square root remains positive. A generalized proof for flipping signs in limits involving polynomials and roots is sought.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with polynomial expressions
  • Knowledge of square root properties
  • Experience with variable substitution techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of limits at infinity in calculus
  • Learn about polynomial behavior as \(x\) approaches negative infinity
  • Research variable substitution methods in limit evaluations
  • Explore generalized proofs for limits involving polynomials and roots
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and polynomial functions, as well as educators seeking to clarify limit evaluation techniques.

farleyknight
Messages
143
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



\lim_{x \to -\infty} x + \sqrt{x^2 + 6x}

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Previous attempt was guessing it was \infty, but I see now my flaw and the actual answer is -3. Somewhere else on the web, might have been this forum, it was said that one could flip the sign and get

\lim_{x \to -\infty} x + \sqrt{x^2 + 6x} = \lim_{x \to \infty} -x + \sqrt{x^2 + 6x}

Which I can see intuitively, since the what is under the radical would be positive either way, which implies that the sign only need be flipped for x. However, is there a generalized proof that includes any number of polynomials and roots, for this fact?

Thanks,
- Farley
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are doing is substituting -u for x. Then as x->-infinity, u->+infinity. But x+sqrt(x^2+6x) turns into -u+sqrt(u^2-6u), doesn't it?
 
Yeah, that's probably a mistake.. But that does explain it. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
7K