Floor Function (Greatest Integer Function) Identity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the inequality [2x] + [2y] ≥ [x] + [y] + [x + y] for all x, y ∈ ℝ using properties of the floor function. The user utilizes the floor function notation [·] and the fractional part notation {·} to derive key inequalities. The proof leverages established inequalities such as [x + y] ≥ [x] + [y] and the relationship [x + n] = [x] + n for integers n. The user successfully resolves the proof by incorporating the identity [2x] = [x] + [x + 1/2].

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the floor function [·] and fractional part {·} of real numbers.
  • Familiarity with basic properties of inequalities involving real numbers.
  • Knowledge of integer properties and their relationship with real numbers.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving inequalities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the floor function in detail, focusing on its behavior with sums and products.
  • Learn about the implications of fractional parts in inequalities involving real numbers.
  • Explore advanced inequalities in real analysis, particularly those involving multiple variables.
  • Investigate the applications of the floor function in number theory and combinatorics.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in real analysis or inequalities involving the floor function.

tylerc1991
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that, for all [itex]x, y \in \mathbb{R}[/itex],

[itex][2x] + [2y] \geq [x] + [y] + [x + y][/itex].

Homework Equations



I am using [itex][\cdot][/itex] to represent the floor function, and [itex]\{\cdot\}[/itex] to represent the fractional part of a real number ([itex]\{x\} = x - [x][/itex] for real numbers [itex]x[/itex]).

We may take for granted that [itex][x + y] \geq [x] + [y][/itex]. (1)

We may also take for granted that [itex][x + n] = [x] + n[/itex] for [itex]n \in \mathbb{Z}[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution



Let [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]y[/itex] be real numbers. Using inequality (1) above, we see that [itex][2x] \geq 2[x][/itex] and [itex][2y] \geq 2[y][/itex]. So I can say that

[itex][2x] + [2y] \geq 2[x] + 2[y][/itex]. (a)

By definition, [itex]x = \{x\} + [x][/itex], so we see that [itex][x + y] = [\{x\} + [x] + \{y\} + [y]] = [\{x\} + \{y\}] + [x] + [y] \leq 1 + [x] + [y][/itex]. This is equivalent to

[itex]-[x + y] \geq -1 - [x] - [y][/itex]. (b)

Adding equations (a) and (b), we see that

[itex][2x] + [2y] + 1 \geq [x] + [y] + [x + y][/itex].

I am annoyingly close, and as much as I wish I could get rid of that pesky '1', I can't seem to at the moment. Could someone please give me a little direction? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the fact that [itex][2x] = [x] + [x + 1/2][/itex], I figured it out!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K