Calculating Electric Field Flux for Non-Uniform Fields: Gaussian Cubes Example

  • Thread starter Thread starter vysero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Flux
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating electric field flux through Gaussian cubes in non-uniform electric fields, specifically using Gauss' Law. It confirms that the total electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the charge enclosed divided by the permittivity of free space (ε₀). In scenarios where no charge is enclosed, such as with a cube of side length 0.5 m and a total flux of 40 through five faces, the flux through the sixth face must be -40, ensuring the net flux remains zero. This principle holds true regardless of the electric field distribution outside the cube.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law and its application in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and scalar quantities
  • Knowledge of the permittivity of free space (ε₀)
  • Basic principles of electric flux and charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Gauss' Law in various charge configurations
  • Explore the concept of electric flux in non-uniform fields
  • Learn about the relationship between electric field strength and flux through different surfaces
  • Investigate advanced applications of Gaussian surfaces in electrostatics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone interested in applying Gauss' Law to solve problems involving electric fields and flux calculations.

vysero
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



6 Gaussian cubes are shown below. The surfaces are located within space containing non-uniform electric
fields. The electric fields are produced by charge distributions located outside the cubes (no charges in
the cubes). Given for each case is the side length for the cube as well as the total electric flux through 5
out of 6 of the cube faces. Determine the electric field flux through the remaining sixth face. Rank the
electric flux through the remaining side from greatest positive to the greatest negative. Electric field flux
is a scalar quantity and not a vector. A negative value is possible and would be ranked lower than a
positive value (X = 200, Y = 0, Z = -200 would be ordered X=1, Y=2, Z=3)2. Homework Equations

Q(enclosed)/E(knot)[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a theory but I need a question answered first. Is the flux always equal to the charge enclosed divided by epsilon knot? Cause that would make this question easy to answer. However, if this is only true for a uniform electric field than that changes things. For instance, one of the cubes has a side length a = .5 m and the flux through 5 of the six sides is 40. Does that simply mean the flux through the sixth side must be -40? The reason I think that is because there is no charge enclosed, zero divided by anything equals zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vysero said:
Is the flux always equal to the charge enclosed divided by epsilon knot?
Yes, that's Gauss' law. (Total flux through a closed surface.)

vysero said:
Cause that would make this question easy to answer.
Don't fight it.

vysero said:
For instance, one of the cubes has a side length a = .5 m and the flux through 5 of the six sides is 40. Does that simply mean the flux through the sixth side must be -40?
Yep.

vysero said:
The reason I think that is because there is no charge enclosed, zero divided by anything equals zero.
The total flux is zero, and the total flux equals the sum of the flux through each side of the cube.
 
The net flux if the charge is not enclosed should be zero. It shouldn't matter how the field is distributed, whether inside or outside the boundary. This fact allows for the simplified determination of flux through surfaces
 
Awesome okay thanks guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
750
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K