Flux Calculation for Non-Uniform Electric Field on Cube Sides

  • Thread starter Thread starter Melawrghk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric flux through the sides of a cube placed in a non-uniform electric field described by the vector E=-4.33xi+2.32zk. The cube has a side length of 0.370 m and is positioned with one corner at the origin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the absence of a y-component in the electric field and its implications for flux through the y-axis faces. They explore the flux calculations for the x-axis faces and question the need to account for the varying electric field based on the x-coordinate. There is also a consideration of whether integration is necessary for the flux calculation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants sharing their reasoning and questioning assumptions about the electric field's behavior across the cube's faces. Some guidance has been provided regarding the coordinates of the faces and the relevance of the x-coordinate in determining the electric field strength.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of the problem, specifically focusing on the non-uniform nature of the electric field and its impact on flux calculations. There is an emphasis on understanding how to apply the electric field values at specific coordinates of the cube.

Melawrghk
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cube has sides of length L = 0.370 m. It is placed with one corner at the origin. The electric field is not uniform but is given by E=-4.33xi+2.32zk.
Find flux through every side of the cube.

Homework Equations


Flux=EA


The Attempt at a Solution


There is no y-component to E, so I figured there wouldn't be any flux through the sides perpendicular to the y-axis.
For those faces perpendicular to x-axis:
the field is pointing left, so for the face on the left, the flux would be positive (it's leaving the face) and for face on the right, the flux would be negative (it's entering the face).
Flux (left face) = (0.37^2)*4.33=0.593

I used similar approach for all other faces, but that's wrong. Then I saw that it's -4.33x *i. So does that mean I have to multiply by 0.37 again? Because that's apparently wrong too.

Thanks, help will be really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume the sides of the cube are parallel to the axes.
Melawrghk said:

The Attempt at a Solution


There is no y-component to E, so I figured there wouldn't be any flux through the sides perpendicular to the y-axis.
Good.
For those faces perpendicular to x-axis:
the field is pointing left, so for the face on the left, the flux would be positive (it's leaving the face) and for face on the right, the flux would be negative (it's entering the face).
Flux (left face) = (0.37^2)*4.33=0.593
What's the x coordinate of that left face? What's the field? (Same questions for the right face.)

I used similar approach for all other faces, but that's wrong. Then I saw that it's -4.33x *i. So does that mean I have to multiply by 0.37 again?
It means that the field depends on the value of the x coordinate.
 
Coordinate of the x-face? Well, it stretches from 0 to 0.37, should I integrate for all values?
 
Melawrghk said:
Coordinate of the x-face? Well, it stretches from 0 to 0.37, should I integrate for all values?
The x-coordinate of the two faces that are perpendicular to the x-axis. You need it to find the field. No need to integrate.
 
Oh I see. So like, in my case, the two faces will intersect the x-axis at 0 and 0.37, so I put those values in?
 
Melawrghk said:
So like, in my case, the two faces will intersect the x-axis at 0 and 0.37, so I put those values in?
Yes.
 
Awesome, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K