Focusing of a 2D Parabolic Mirror

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DonLumpo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Mirror
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the analysis of the focusing properties of a 2D parabolic mirror through the lens of third-order aberration theory. Key findings indicate that the maxima of the scattered field from shallow reflectors align along a curve that bends towards the reflector as the angle of incidence increases. The discussion highlights the importance of Petzval curvature, where the sagittal and tangential image surfaces coincide in the absence of astigmatism. Additionally, it clarifies that the largest off-axis aberration in parabolic reflectors is typically coma, not field curvature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of third-order aberration theory
  • Familiarity with Petzval curvature in optical systems
  • Knowledge of full-wave simulations in optics
  • Basic principles of wave optics and ray optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the computation of aberration coefficients in optical systems
  • Explore the handling of parabolas in wave optics
  • Study the effects of coma in parabolic reflectors
  • Investigate the relationship between photonics and electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Optics students, electrical engineers, and researchers in photonics who are interested in the focusing properties of parabolic mirrors and the implications of aberration theory.

DonLumpo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Summary: How to explain the focusing properties of a 2D parabolic mirror based on third-order aberration theory?

Hello everyone,

I am currently studying with full-wave simulations the focusing properties of a 2D parabolic mirror, i.e. the scattered fields resulting from plane wave incidence at oblique angles.

What I observe for shallow reflectors is that the maxima of the scattered field generally lie on a curve that bends towards the reflector for increasing angles of incidence, just as the tangential focal surface shown in the attached figure.

243253


What I learned for the 3D case (paraboloid mirror) is the following:
- As every optical system, the mirror has associated with it a sort of basic field curvature, called the Petzval curvature. When there is no astigmatism, the sagittal and tangential image surfaces coincide with each other and lie on the Petzval surface

- The sagittal focal surface from third-order Seidel aberration theory is the focal plane, and the tangential focal surface lies between the focal plane and the mirror

- As in any optical system, the tangential surface is three times as far from the Petzval surface as the sagittal surface

Now my question is, how can the focusing contour that I observe for the 2D case (obviously astigmatism is not defined in 2D) be explained with this/third-order aberration theory?

Many thanks
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
I'm curious. Why did you choose Electrical Engineering for your optics question?
 
DonLumpo said:
Summary: How to explain the focusing properties of a 2D parabolic mirror based on third-order aberration theory?
<snip>

I am currently studying with full-wave simulations the focusing properties of a 2D parabolic mirror, i.e. the scattered fields resulting from plane wave incidence at oblique angles.

I'm not entirely sure what you are asking- for one thing, you seem to be mixing ray (third-order aberrations) and wave optics models. Are you asking how aberration coefficients are computed in general? Are you asking how parabolas are handled in wave optics? Are you asking for detailed computations of aberration coefficients for a parabolic mirror?

The largest off-axis aberration of parabolic reflectors is usually coma, not field curvature:

https://www.telescope-optics.net/Newtonian_off_axis_aberrations.htm
 
anorlunda said:
I'm curious. Why did you choose Electrical Engineering for your optics question?
Hm, it's not a bad choice given that optics is entirely a subject of (quantum) electrodynamics and its applications, I'd call "electrical engineering". Well nowadays one talks about "photonics" in analogy to "electronics". Whether you consider photonics also as part of electrical engineering is just a matter of choice. I'm not sure whether the standard electrical-engineering curriculum today also already contains some photonics ;-)).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
945
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
21K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
11K