Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Following an example. Implies L{2du/dt+1}=2s+1. I'm Confused.

  1. Feb 9, 2017 #1
    So I am reading a handout on transfer functions, and I got to this one example that doesn't seem right to me - which usually means I'm missing something.

    It looks like this:
    Screenshot_02092017_06_09_00_PM.png

    My understanding is that the numerator in H(s) is supposed to be the laplace transform of the input for the differential equation, so N(s)=L{2du/dt+1}.

    I'm not sure how the author got {2du/dt+1}=2s+1. Isn't L{1} supposed to be 1/s? And I'm not sure what to make of L{2du/dt}.

    Maybe the author is using "u" to notate the unit step function, so du/dt would be the dirac delta function δ(t), and L{2δ(t)}=2 . Still, where does 2s come from? Why wouldn't they have just written 2δ(t) in the first place? And that still doesn't explain how, apparently, according to the author L{1}=1.

    Any clarification is greatly appreciated.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 9, 2017 #2

    FactChecker

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    A derivative in the t-space gives multiplication by s in the s-space. And integration in the t-space gives division by s in the s-space.

    (For proofs, see

    and
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2017
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Following an example. Implies L{2du/dt+1}=2s+1. I'm Confused.
  1. (1/2)y'' + y^2 = 1 (Replies: 9)

  2. Y' = 1/(x^N+1) (Replies: 30)

  3. 1/(1-x) identities (Replies: 5)

Loading...