So I am reading a handout on transfer functions, and I got to this one example that doesn't seem right to me - which usually means I'm missing something.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It looks like this:

My understanding is that the numerator in H(s) is supposed to be the laplace transform of the input for the differential equation, so N(s)=L{2du/dt+1}.

I'm not sure how the author got {2du/dt+1}=2s+1. Isn't L{1} supposed to be 1/s? And I'm not sure what to make of L{2du/dt}.

Maybe the author is using "u" to notate the unit step function, so du/dt would be the dirac delta function δ(t), and L{2δ(t)}=2 . Still, where does 2s come from? Why wouldn't they have just written 2δ(t) in the first place? And that still doesn't explain how, apparently, according to the author L{1}=1.

Any clarification is greatly appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Following an example. Implies L{2du/dt+1}=2s+1. I'm Confused.

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Following example Implies | Date |
---|---|

A How to simplify the solution of the following linear homogeneous ODE? | Feb 18, 2018 |

A Rayleigh-Ritz Example | Jun 29, 2017 |

I How to solve the two following differential equations? | Nov 21, 2016 |

A Is there an analytical solution to the following problem? | May 20, 2016 |

Are the following PDEs linear or nonlinear? | Sep 11, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**