For those who have or about to complete your phd

  • Programs
  • Thread starter facetten
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Complete Phd
In summary, Matt thinks that it takes a lot of time and effort to become an expert in one's field. He thinks that it's important to remember that you are not a expert until you have completed your Ph.D.
  • #1
facetten
5
0
do you think you're an expert on your field? or just about as competent as your advisor?

like i just want to know how it feels, i spent lots of hours on this one computer game , i can sort of feel what's like to be very good at one thing. i wonder if that's how you feel after completing a phd? obviously the ceiling is much higher in academia. but, I'm asking because I'm about to leave school, i still hope to have a phd one day, the sad thing is that, I'm not very focused right now and need a break from school. i can handle the material for my master program, but i feel like I'm not learning much at all. i guess, my question is, how long does it take you to become one of the best?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
facetten said:
do you think you're an expert on your field? or just about as competent as your advisor?

Both answers are NO.
 
  • #3
facetten said:
do you think you're an expert on your field? or just about as competent as your advisor?

I believe I have become relevant in the narrow subfield of my field that is all. I am able to do research in it, and others' have communicated, and emailed me with regards to my papers. That is all.
 
  • #4
facetten said:
do you think you're an expert on your field? or just about as competent as your advisor?

To the first, not really.

To the second, in certain narrow areas related directly to my thesis, I'm probably significantly more competent than my advisor. In terms of broad understanding of the field, not at all.
 
  • #5
When I had just completed my PhD I was an expert in the problem I was working on. I knew more about the problem and methods for solving it than most people in my field and was generally on par with others that were working on it.

An analogy I might draw is that doing the PhD was like paving a road. You make your way down the road inch by inch, sometimes having to repave over the bumpy parts. By the end you know that road really really well. But you don't know too much about the roads through the rest of the city. You know some general stuff about them, because you know the road you worked on really really well and most roads are fairly similar.

Supervisors have paved more roads, so they naturally know more of the city.
 
  • #6
Choppy said:
When I had just completed my PhD I was an expert in the problem I was working on. I knew more about the problem and methods for solving it than most people in my field and was generally on par with others that were working on it.

An analogy I might draw is that doing the PhD was like paving a road. You make your way down the road inch by inch, sometimes having to repave over the bumpy parts. By the end you know that road really really well. But you don't know too much about the roads through the rest of the city. You know some general stuff about them, because you know the road you worked on really really well and most roads are fairly similar.

Supervisors have paved more roads, so they naturally know more of the city.

that is a very good analogy, i think i get it now thanks
 
  • #7
This: http://matt.might.net/articles/phd-school-in-pictures/

I think a lot of people have described it well above...

I just defended a couple of weeks ago. I felt like I could answer the questions my committee asked me well, and I'm very confident in describing my specific tiny area of research. But that doesn't even mean I feel like an expert in my major (nuclear engineering), or the more specific subfields either... only when you get down to your very specific topic do you feel like one of the most knowledgeable people in the room.

Don't expect to feel like you have all the answers when you get your PhD, but you do learn a lot about how to figure out answers to interesting questions.
 
  • #8
facetten said:
do you think you're an expert on your field? or just about as competent as your advisor?

1) Yes. They will not give you a Ph.D. unless you are an expert in your field. Now whether or not you *feel* like an expert is a psychological issue (i.e. google for the imposter syndrome).

2) In the particular topic of my Ph.D., I know more than my adviser. There are lot of things that my adviser knows more about than me, and that's a function of the fact that he is older than I am.

like i just want to know how it feels, i spent lots of hours on this one computer game , i can sort of feel what's like to be very good at one thing. i wonder if that's how you feel after completing a phd?

It actually doesn't feel like that. Once you climb one mountain you realize that there are about a dozen more mountains that you weren't aware of.
 
  • #9
One should always know more about the subject of PhD thesis than anyone else in the world. However, I do not think that this makes the person a master of the field. Just the particular (sub)subfield... Building mastery takes years of hard work, that's why one usually would not be better than his/her supervizor in the whole field.
 
  • #10
How long does it take you to become one of the best, it depends on one merit. I think merit is the main thing for to be a successful one.
 

What are the benefits of completing a PhD?

Completing a PhD can open up many opportunities in both academia and industry. It can lead to higher-paying jobs, greater job security, and opportunities for career advancement. Additionally, a PhD can provide an opportunity to conduct original research and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in your field.

How long does it typically take to complete a PhD?

The length of a PhD program can vary depending on the field of study, the individual's research project, and their progress. Generally, it takes 4-6 years to complete a PhD program full-time. However, some programs may take longer, especially if the research is complex or requires extensive data collection and analysis.

What is the difference between a PhD and other graduate degrees?

A PhD is a research-based degree that requires original research and a dissertation. Other graduate degrees, such as a Master's degree, may also involve research, but typically have a greater focus on coursework and may not require a dissertation. A PhD is also considered the highest level of academic achievement and is often required for certain career paths, such as becoming a professor.

What are the common challenges faced during a PhD program?

Some common challenges faced during a PhD program include managing time and workload effectively, dealing with setbacks and failures in research, and maintaining a work-life balance. PhD students may also face financial challenges, as many programs do not provide full funding. Additionally, the pressure to publish and meet expectations from advisors and peers can also be challenging.

What advice do you have for someone considering a PhD program?

My advice would be to carefully research and consider your options before committing to a PhD program. Talk to current and former PhD students to get a better understanding of the program and the potential challenges. It's also important to have a clear research interest and to find an advisor who is a good fit for your research goals and working style. Finally, be prepared to work hard and stay committed to your research, as a PhD program can be a demanding and long journey.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
398
Replies
7
Views
236
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
754
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
895
Replies
3
Views
837
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
264
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
812
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
625
Back
Top