I Force between Positive and Negative Electrical Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the force between positive and negative electrical charges, particularly in the context of electromagnetic fields. Participants explore the difficulty in defining what charge is and the mechanisms behind the attractive forces between oppositely charged particles, noting that these concepts often lead to complex theoretical explanations. The role of virtual exchange particles, such as photons, is highlighted as a way to understand force mediation in quantum mechanics. Despite the mathematical frameworks available, there remains a lack of intuitive understanding regarding why these forces exist at a fundamental level. Ultimately, the conversation reflects the ongoing challenge in physics to explain basic phenomena like electric charge and force without resorting to deeper, often abstract theories.
Martyn Arthur
Messages
114
Reaction score
20
I have in the past been criricised for inappropriate postings that I could have resolved with research so this time I have done the research first.
The best solution I have found is from wiki "that causes it to experience a force when placed in an electromagnetic field."
What causes the force to occur?
What physical particle, occurrence, action, actually creates the attractive states between oppositely charged particles, say when remote from each other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Martyn Arthur said:
The best solution I have found is from wiki "that causes it to experience a force when placed in an electromagnetic field."

"that causes it to experience a force when placed in an electromagnetic field" is a quote from wikipedia lemma electric charge.

So basically you are asking 'what is charge" and you feel as if you get the runaround. I sympathize, but I don't think anyone can help you. From the wording in the electromagnetic field lemma
wikipedia said:
It is the field described by classical electrodynamics and is the classical counterpart to the quantized electromagnetic field tensor in quantum electrodynamics.
you are being referred to another world, but even there "charge" is a property that describes a measure of coupling to the EM field.

Duh. Apparently we can very well (understatement!) describe phenomena having to do with charge, but are unable to answer a simple question like "what is it".

Turns out the question "what is mass" suffers the same frustrating fate ...

(does it help if you get the answers as
Martyn Arthur said:
What causes the force to occur?
The EM field

Martyn Arthur said:
What physical particle, occurrence, action, actually creates the attractive states between oppositely charged particles, say when remote from each other?
The photon

No? Didn't think so :wink:.)

##\ ##
 
Thank you; it is reassuring that I haven't been booted out.
So Is it right to say the following, or what am I missing please?
a. There may be mathematical / theoretical explanations that seek to provide an answer (theoretical or otherwise) to the question, I am in my first year of my physics degree so have not encountered them yet.
b. or, absolutely pragmatically, there is no known pragmatic, physical or otherwise explanation that can attribute the reason why remote particles experience the force.
Thank you guys for your patience!
Martyn
 
Martyn Arthur said:
a. There may be mathematical / theoretical explanations that seek to provide an answer (theoretical or otherwise) to the question,
Yes. The mediation of forces by virtual exchange particles is often used to explain the various forces between particles.

(@BvU already hinted at it when he mentioned ‘The photon’ in Post #2.)

Martyn Arthur said:
I am in my first year of my physics degree so have not encountered them yet.
The basic concept (virtual exchange particles as 'force carriers') seems appropriate to first year physics degree level. You can read-up on it if interested. You would typIcally be taught about it when you covered quantum mechanics and/or the Standard Model.
 
Martyn Arthur said:
Thank you; it is reassuring that I haven't been booted out.
So Is it right to say the following, or what am I missing please?
a. There may be mathematical / theoretical explanations that seek to provide an answer (theoretical or otherwise) to the question, I am in my first year of my physics degree so have not encountered them yet.
b. or, absolutely pragmatically, there is no known pragmatic, physical or otherwise explanation that can attribute the reason why remote particles experience the force.
Thank you guys for your patience!
Martyn
It's an interesting point that some people criticize QM, for example, for not having a comprehensible mechanism. But, when you look at classical gravity and EM, you have the same issue. There is no intuitive reason that a negative charge creates an electric field which attracts a positive charge and vice versa.

It's called Coulomb's and it is fundamental with no deeper underlying explanation.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top