Force method vs superposition method

Click For Summary
Both the force method and superposition method are viable for solving statically indeterminate structures, with the choice depending on which method simplifies the calculations. The complexity of the structure often dictates which approach is more straightforward. Determining where to "cut" sections for internal forces relies on experience and familiarity with similar problems. Practicing with progressively complex geometries helps build intuition for these decisions. Ultimately, the effectiveness of each method varies based on the specific scenario presented.
member 392791
Hello,

I was wondering, is there a preference for when to use either of these methods for solving statically indeterminate structures, or are both equally viable in all situations?

Also, when using these how does one know where to ''cut'' the sections up to find the internal forces?

Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The preferred method is whichever makes the math simple enough to actually do... ideally you want to try the method which loos like it will give the simplest math. For arbitrarily complicated structures, it won't be easy to tell which on that is.

You know how to cut the sections by referring to your copious experience doing similar problems and trusting your gut. This is why students are given lots of exercises starting from quite easy geometries and building up. Eventually you'll recognize when a structure looks a bit like one that you already know how to solve and use that to guide you.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K